The U.S. president is still trying to sell the world on the destruction of Gaza.
By Edward Hunt, Foreign Policy in Focus
Among all the cons that Donald Trump has pushed on the world, none has compared to his plan for facilitating genocide in Gaza.
While his administration has continued providing Israel with the weapons that it is using to destroy Gaza, the U.S. president has been making a business pitch in favor of genocide. By proposing to depopulate Gaza and develop it into “the Riviera of the Middle East,” Trump has been trying to persuade the world’s wealthiest people that they can gain from the destruction of the territory. Although the media has shifted its focus away from Trump’s proposal, he continues to promote it.
“Think about it,” Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said in a speech from the Senate floor on May 8. “2.2 million desperate people who have been bombed and starved and driven from their homes are now about to be forcibly expelled from their territory into God knows where so that Trump and his friends can build a Riviera for the billionaire class.”

In the United States, there is a long history of U.S. leaders making arguments in favor of genocide. Although the term genocide was not coined until World War II as part of an effort to condemn the Nazis for the Holocaust and hold them legally accountable for their crimes against humanity, previous generations of U.S. officials had developed arguments for eliminating entire groups of people.
For centuries, some of the most influential U.S. politicians envisioned the eradication of Native Americans. Benjamin Franklin thought that it could be “the design of Providence to extirpate these savages,” as he called indigenous people. Their elimination would “make room for the cultivators of the earth,” meaning Anglo-American settlers.
Thomas Jefferson believed that the United States would commit genocide against Native Americans. In a reference to what he called “backward” groups of Native Americans, Jefferson wrote that “we shall be obliged to drive them, with the beasts of the forest, into the stony mountains.” Attacks by Native Americans against U.S. settlers “will oblige us now to pursue them to extermination, or drive them to new seats beyond our reach.”
Often, U.S. officials have appealed to notions of manifest destiny, or the idea that God has chosen U.S. settlers to inhabit all of America. In 1845, the prominent political writer John O’Sullivan popularized the notion when he wrote about “our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence.”
Recent Posts
The U.S. Bombed a Wedding in Iran. It’s Not the First Time
September 3, 2026
Take Action Now The Iranian Red Crescent Society has asked the International Criminal Court to investigate the U.S. strike, saying that if the…
25 Years Ago, 9/11 Triggered a U.S. Crusade of Torture
September 3, 2026
Take Action Now But in spite of the voluminous evidence that documented high-level approval of methodical torture, not a single U.S. official went to…
Big Tech’s Debate Over “Open” and “Safe” AI Leaves Corporate Power Unquestioned
September 2, 2026
Take Action Now Two seemingly contradictory letters emerging from the AI industry point toward the same future.By Tim Scott, truthout On July 24,…
Venezuela Under Siege: What Should Progressives Do?
September 2, 2026
Take Action Now How should we respond when a government resisting US domination makes compromises that we may oppose, but does so under conditions…




