As a veteran climate and social justice activist, I see our side finally beginning to turn the tide.
By Ted Glick, The Nation
“You are wearing people out,” complained Senator Joe Manchin at a March 4 hearing of the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which he chairs. The West Virginia senator, who reportedly receives $500,000 a year from the coal company he founded and that’s now run by his son, was reprimanding three commissioners of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the little-known, immensely powerful agency that regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, methane gas, and oil. FERC’s approval is required before private companies can install an oil or gas pipeline, build a liquid natural gas terminal, or construct other types of fossil fuel infrastructure. In the past, that approval has almost always been given: Since 1999, FERC has approved 99 percent of the gas industry’s project applications, which is no small reason why the planet is dangerously overheating.

Manchin was angry because FERC had recently signaled a potential change in course. On February 17, the five commissioners whose decisions set FERC policy had adopted a new policy: Before FERC would rule on a given project, an impact assessment would be required. FERC would assess the proposed project’s effect on local landowners and communities, including low-income communities where people of color often predominate, as well as the project’s effect on the environment in general and climate change in particular.
The vote adopting the new policy was close: 3 to 2, with the three commissioners who were Democrats outvoting the two Republicans. At his committee hearing, Manchin directed his ire at the three Democratic commissioners. “There’s a policy by some of death by a thousand cuts on the fossil fuel industry,” he said, before warning that the new FERC rule threatened America’s energy security and economic prosperity. If their projects had to pass such a community and environmental impact assessment, Manchin added, private companies might not pursue the projects in the first place. “I know these people,” he said, in an inadvertently revealing comment. “They’re not going to invest. They’re going to walk away.”
Recent Posts
The Private Equity Lobbyist Network Surrounding Chuck Schumer
November 6, 2026
Take Action Now Blackstone, Apollo, and private equity trade groups employ Schumer alumni to push their interests in Washington as progressive…
With 74% of Voters Saying Iran War Was Big Factor in Midterms, Dems Urged to Become Peace Party
November 6, 2026
Take Action Now “Will Democrats finally get it?” asked one progressive expert. “Americans are tired of war. They want a new foreign policy.”By…
Democrats Have Been Handed an Antiwar Mandate — and the Opportunity to Enact It
November 5, 2026
Take Action Now The Democratically controlled Congress must go further than just war powers resolutions, an ex-Biden official says.By Sharon…
Van Hollen Says No Rubber Stamp for Schumer as Majority Leader Without Support for ‘Bold Agenda’
November 5, 2026
Take Action Now “It’s not a time for incrementalism,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen. “It’s a time to move forward a very bold kitchen table agenda.”…




