New study compares SF, Sacramento—and finds that a more progressive approach to criminal justice is associated with lower crime rates.
By Tim Redmond, 48 Hills
Crime in San Francisco under progressive District Attorney Chesa Boudin and his predecessor has been lower across the board than in Sacramento, where the old-school DA touts her “tough-on-crime” credential, a new study shows.
The study by the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice shows that violent crimes have fallen 29 percent in San Francisco since 2014, including the past two years when Boudin has been in office.
Durng that same period, in the tenure of conservative prosecutor Anne Marie Schubert, violent crime in Sacramento increased 9 percent.

Schubert, who is now running for attorney general, promotes longer prison sentences and more aggressive prosecution of all types of crime, and blames progressive politics for failing to protect public safety. In an interview with the San Diego Union Tribune, she noted:
Like so many, I am fed up with the escalation of criminal activity around the state, which brings nothing but chaos and destruction to our neighborhoods and communities. As a career prosecutor, I understand that this will not change until we are willing to admit that certain policies have for too long prioritized criminals over crime victims.
Recent Posts
Why is the Democratic Party Still Hiding its 2024 Election Autopsy?
May 15, 2026
Take Action Now No one has more at stake than Kamala Harris – who has ‘signaled’ support for its release without saying so publiclyBy Norman…
Economic Populism Against the Oligarchs
May 15, 2026
Take Action Now They Rigged the Country Against Us. The Working Class Has Had EnoughBy Jackson Rubin, The Working Model For decades, Americans…
Waterboarding for Dollars in Cuba
May 14, 2026
Take Action Now “What the United States is doing to Cubans is equivalent to waterboarding them into submission, and all CBS could seem to talk about…
The Surveillance Economy Is Here. This Is How We Fight Back.
May 14, 2026
Take Action Now Rejecting surveillance capitalism means insisting, clearly and unapologetically, that markets should serve the people — not the other…




