Lockheed Martin is the largest military contractor with the Department of Defense, the world’s largest institutional consumer of fossil fuels. Lockheed was recently asked point-blank if it will address its role in worsening climate change. Its answer: no.
by Danaka Katovich and David Gibson, Jacobin
Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest military contractor, will have its shareholder meeting on April 27. There, shareholders are slated to vote on a resolution to require a company report “disclosing how the Company intends to reduce its full value chain greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C degree goal requiring Net Zero emissions by 2050.” The board at Lockheed advised all their shareholders to vote against this resolution, making it clear that in addition to promoting conflict and violence around the world, Lockheed Martin is also uninterested in scaling back its significant contribution to climate change.
In the board’s reasoning, shareholders should vote no on the resolution because it is “premature and not in the best interest of our Company or our stockholders.” To suggest that acting on the unfolding climate catastrophe is “premature” speaks volumes about the lack of urgency Lockheed executives see around the climate crisis. According to a recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the threshold for critical changes in the climate will likely happen within this decade. The report emphasizes that we must make an immediate shift away from fossil fuels to prevent climate collapse. The idea that any action on climate change is premature is a blatant falsehood at worst or willfully ignorant at best.

As we face the stark reality of looming climate disaster, the board’s statement is a candid admission of Lockheed executives’ values. From this, one can truly determine that they value profit over everything else — in case that weren’t clear from, say, the slaughter of forty Yemeni schoolchildren with a Lockheed Martin–manufactured bomb, or countless other horrific acts of violence routinely committed with the company’s profitable products.
Recent Posts
Call It Genocide, Pay The Price
December 1, 2023
Take Action Now Private colleges and employers can, and do, ignore the right to speak freely. By Bill Lueders, The Progressive A common…
U.S. Says If CIA-Backed Embassy Security Opened Phones Of Assange Visitors, It Was Constitutional
December 1, 2023
Take Action Now “There are several cases,” U.S. Attorney Jean-David Barnea argued, “that say that by giving your phone to someone else, you have…
Mehdi Hasan Is Fired From MSNBC After Reports Critical Of Israel
December 1, 2023
Take Action Now “Mehdi Hasan’s program has felt like an oasis on air and more needed than ever,” said one Palestinian American…
Israel’s Calculated Bombing Of Gaza Reveals Mass Murder Intent
December 1, 2023
Take Action Now Permissive airstrikes on non-military targets and the use of an artificial intelligence system have enabled the Israeli army to…