Humanitarian intervention is how those profiting from war sell it to the American people. Don’t believe it ever again.
By Achin Vanaik, Jacobin
During the late 1990s and the early 2000s, the doctrine of “humanitarian intervention” came to the fore as a justification for US-led military adventures in the Balkans and the Middle East. A number of recent events have revived our memory of those debates, from the ignominious US withdrawal from Afghanistan, just as the twentieth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks was approaching, to the deaths of leading Bush administration officials such as Donald Rumsfeld and Colin Powell.
For many people, the disastrous outcomes in Iraq and Afghanistan will be enough to discredit the idea of humanitarian intervention. But past experience suggests that the justification it offers for military action is too useful to be discarded by the United States and its allies. Such arguments may well be used in support for future wars. We still need to address and refute the case for “humanitarian” warfare on its own terms.
Recent Posts
This May Day, Let’s Follow The Lead Of Immigrant Workers
May 1, 2024
Take Action Now Let’s follow the lead of immigrant workers organizing for a world without borders — this May Day and beyond. by David Bennion and…
UK Students Begin New Wave Of Protests Against Gaza War After US Arrests
May 1, 2024
Take Action Now Protests planned in Sheffield, Bristol, Leeds, Newcastle and other universities in show of solidarity with Palestinians By Sally…
Police Storm Columbia’s Campus And Violently Arrest Protestors
May 1, 2024
Take Action Now “The U.S. government and institutions like Columbia are showing that they would rather brutalize students than divest from…
They Arrested Us. I Hope It Brings An End To Nuclear Weapons.
May 1, 2024
Take Action Now About 50 people protested April 15 outside the Kansas City National Security Campus, a plant run by Honeywell, calling for an end to…