If Harris wins, her chief of staff selection will determine whether she maintains a united front, or sides with corporate interests.
By Max Moran, The American Prospect
Democratic Party progressives have largely projected solidarity with Kamala Harris against the greater threat of a second Trump term, despite a campaign pitched directly at the moderate Republican voter. However, her embrace of high-dollar fundraising from the financial and technology industries has prompted consternation. To wonkish lefties, one of the big questions is whether, if elected, Harris will maintain the carefully brokered intra-Democratic detente on economic issues established by her current boss, President Joe Biden.
That will be especially relevant if Democrats manage to gain control of the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives. Under similar conditions a few years ago, with the thinnest of majorities, progressives unexpectedly became Biden’s most loyal allies as he delivered a slew of employment- and worker-focused spending bills and policies nicknamed “Big Fiscal.” Harris’s well-heeled friends from corporate America are dead set against her finishing the business of that brief era, such as by passing the pro-union PRO Act.

So will Harris be Lyndon Johnson or Bill Clinton? Big Fiscal or Big Business? We can’t expect clear answers until after November 5th, but a leading indicator will be one of the most important personnel decisions she’ll make, if elected: her White House chief of staff.
The chief of staff’s duties change from administration to administration, but almost always, they decide what the president gets to see. That makes them a crucial circuit breaker. If the chief of staff doesn’t think you matter, then you won’t get your ideas in front of the president.
We can see how powerful this is by contrasting Biden’s two years of a Democratic trifecta (2021-2022) with Barack Obama’s (2009-2010). Obama’s first chief of staff was Rahm Emanuel, a man who built a career out of blaming the left for his own nonstop failings. During the 2008 transition, Emanuel bullied colleagues within the incoming Obama White House out of even proposing their Plan B stimulus, which they already knew was too small to fill the hole left by the financial crisis. The result was the long, painful Great Recession, which did enormous damage to the Democratic brand.
Recent Posts
The Billionaires’ War
March 14, 2026
Take Action Now The ultrawealthy put Trump in power but other people will pay the priceBy Paul Krugman, Substack It becomes clearer with each…
The Quiet Way Trump Has Made Life Easier For Polluters
March 12, 2026
Take Action Now It’s not just about environmental rollbacks: Trump and Lee Zeldin have presided over a striking decline in the EPA enforcing existing…
Coalition Demands Schumer, Jeffries Step Down Over Failure to Fight ‘War-Crazed’ Trump
March 12, 2026
Take Action Now “Schumer and Jeffries have shown that they cannot be trusted to prevent more wars, more threats of wars, or the transfer of another…
Coalition of Antiwar Groups Launches National Campaign Calling for Jeffries and Schumer to Step Aside from Leadership
March 11, 2026
Take Action Now “Schumer and Jeffries have failed their party and country through wobbly leadership when firmness and clarity are needed in opposing…




