The words we use to describe war and foreign policy matter, and they have far reaching implications for policymaking.
From George Orwell’s critique of the language of totalitarian regimes to today, discussions of war and foreign policy have been full of dehumanizing euphemisms, bloodless jargon, little-known government acronyms, and troubling metaphors that hide warfare’s damage.
Think of “collateral damage” (civilian deaths), “overseas contingency operations” (wars), and “bug splat” (killing human beings with drone-fired missiles).
This guide aims to help people write and talk about war and foreign policy more accurately, more honestly, and in ways people outside the elite Washington, DC foreign policy “blob” can understand.
We encourage you to use this guide, to share it with others, and to adapt it as necessary to local contexts. The guide should be especially helpful to journalists and other writers, podcasters and vloggers, policy analysts, teachers, scholars, and people involved in public education projects.
Recent Posts
Populism Without A Party Or Why Senator Chuck Schumer Should Not Be Majority Leader Of The Senate
Take Action Now The 2026 election was a rebuke to the GOP more than an embrace of the Democrats, a rejection of corruption, an expression of…
The Real AI Misalignment Problem Is Capitalism
Take Action Now Figures at top AI firms says that their frontier models are running out of control. It points to a problem Big Tech finds harder to…
Schumer, Jeffries Odds Rise Despite Democrats’ Push for Leadership Change
Take Action Now The Democratic coalition remains divided about whether Schumer and Jeffries, both New York Democrats, should remain party leaders, or…
Why California’s Government Isn’t Working
Take Action Now Bloated by corporate cash, let down by a rotten political system and a perversion of direct democracy, what’s the way back for a…