The words we use to describe war and foreign policy matter, and they have far reaching implications for policymaking.
From George Orwell’s critique of the language of totalitarian regimes to today, discussions of war and foreign policy have been full of dehumanizing euphemisms, bloodless jargon, little-known government acronyms, and troubling metaphors that hide warfare’s damage.
Think of “collateral damage” (civilian deaths), “overseas contingency operations” (wars), and “bug splat” (killing human beings with drone-fired missiles).
This guide aims to help people write and talk about war and foreign policy more accurately, more honestly, and in ways people outside the elite Washington, DC foreign policy “blob” can understand.
We encourage you to use this guide, to share it with others, and to adapt it as necessary to local contexts. The guide should be especially helpful to journalists and other writers, podcasters and vloggers, policy analysts, teachers, scholars, and people involved in public education projects.
Recent Posts
Spanberger’s ICE Actions Deepen Divide with Virginia Democrats
Take Action Now The governor’s vetoes of legislation on marijuana, higher ed, and other reforms have also upset Democratic lawmakers.By Markus…
ICC Targets Smotrich For War Crimes— He Responds by Promising More War Crimes
Take Action Now Smotrich reportedly bragged about helping create more than 100 new settlements and 160 farming outposts, while the U.N. has reported…
Establishment Democrats Still Don’t Get Why They Lost in 2024
Take Action Now No amount of messaging acumen could have plastered over the gaping hole in Harris’ campaign: a total dearth of popular policies.By…
The CIA Goes to Cuba
Take Action Now After decades of covert operations, the CIA director has given the Cubans an overt ultimatum for change on the island.By Peter…