Biden should lead on nuclear disarmament. Instead, he’s carrying the failed policies of the cold war.
By Khury Petersen-Smith, INKSTICK
Even as the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis become the defining, global, existential threats to humanity of the twenty-first century, we are also still living with one from the twentieth: nuclear weapons.
Climate change has impacts well beyond our control that we will have to deal with even if we make the changes necessary to stop it. And while policy can mitigate the spread of disease or make it much, much worse, infectious disease is a part of nature. Nuclear weapons, on the other hand, are entirely human creations. The threats posed by them are due solely to the governments that harbor them, and it is entirely the responsibility of those governments to eliminate them.
As the government that brought the weapons into the world, the only one to use them in war, and one that possesses one of the largest arsenals, the United States has a responsibility to take the lead on disarmament. Instead, it is doing the opposite.
Recent Posts
The Private Equity Lobbyist Network Surrounding Chuck Schumer
Take Action Now Blackstone, Apollo, and private equity trade groups employ Schumer alumni to push their interests in Washington as progressive…
With 74% of Voters Saying Iran War Was Big Factor in Midterms, Dems Urged to Become Peace Party
Take Action Now “Will Democrats finally get it?” asked one progressive expert. “Americans are tired of war. They want a new foreign policy.”By…
Democrats Have Been Handed an Antiwar Mandate — and the Opportunity to Enact It
Take Action Now The Democratically controlled Congress must go further than just war powers resolutions, an ex-Biden official says.By Sharon…
Van Hollen Says No Rubber Stamp for Schumer as Majority Leader Without Support for ‘Bold Agenda’
Take Action Now “It’s not a time for incrementalism,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen. “It’s a time to move forward a very bold kitchen table agenda.”…