Biden should lead on nuclear disarmament. Instead, he’s carrying the failed policies of the cold war.
By Khury Petersen-Smith, INKSTICK
Even as the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis become the defining, global, existential threats to humanity of the twenty-first century, we are also still living with one from the twentieth: nuclear weapons.
Climate change has impacts well beyond our control that we will have to deal with even if we make the changes necessary to stop it. And while policy can mitigate the spread of disease or make it much, much worse, infectious disease is a part of nature. Nuclear weapons, on the other hand, are entirely human creations. The threats posed by them are due solely to the governments that harbor them, and it is entirely the responsibility of those governments to eliminate them.

As the government that brought the weapons into the world, the only one to use them in war, and one that possesses one of the largest arsenals, the United States has a responsibility to take the lead on disarmament. Instead, it is doing the opposite.
Recent Posts
Did A Federal Judge Sink Super PACs?
November 13, 2025
Take Action Now The judge blocked a ban on Super PACs in Maine — but legal activists discovered a kill switch inside the ruling.By David Sirota…
The Corporate Centrists Cannot Hold: ‘Big Tent’ Democrats Cave Once More
November 13, 2025
Take Action Now The perils of unprincipled, performative so-called “resistance.”By Christopher D. Cook, Common Dreams Wow, seriously? The…
One Weird Trick To Get Rid Of Chuck Schumer
November 12, 2025
Take Action Now Any single Senate Democrat can force a vote on Schumer’s job as minority leader.By Whitney Curry Wimbish, The American Prospect…
I Was One of the First People to Say “Don’t Run, Joe.” Now I’m Saying “Step Down, Chuck.”
November 11, 2025
Take Action Now Senate Democrats’ collapse in the latest government funding fight is just the latest example of the party’s inability to advance bold…




