As a veteran climate and social justice activist, I see our side finally beginning to turn the tide.
By Ted Glick, The Nation
“You are wearing people out,” complained Senator Joe Manchin at a March 4 hearing of the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which he chairs. The West Virginia senator, who reportedly receives $500,000 a year from the coal company he founded and that’s now run by his son, was reprimanding three commissioners of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the little-known, immensely powerful agency that regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, methane gas, and oil. FERC’s approval is required before private companies can install an oil or gas pipeline, build a liquid natural gas terminal, or construct other types of fossil fuel infrastructure. In the past, that approval has almost always been given: Since 1999, FERC has approved 99 percent of the gas industry’s project applications, which is no small reason why the planet is dangerously overheating.
Manchin was angry because FERC had recently signaled a potential change in course. On February 17, the five commissioners whose decisions set FERC policy had adopted a new policy: Before FERC would rule on a given project, an impact assessment would be required. FERC would assess the proposed project’s effect on local landowners and communities, including low-income communities where people of color often predominate, as well as the project’s effect on the environment in general and climate change in particular.
The vote adopting the new policy was close: 3 to 2, with the three commissioners who were Democrats outvoting the two Republicans. At his committee hearing, Manchin directed his ire at the three Democratic commissioners. “There’s a policy by some of death by a thousand cuts on the fossil fuel industry,” he said, before warning that the new FERC rule threatened America’s energy security and economic prosperity. If their projects had to pass such a community and environmental impact assessment, Manchin added, private companies might not pursue the projects in the first place. “I know these people,” he said, in an inadvertently revealing comment. “They’re not going to invest. They’re going to walk away.”
Recent Posts
Putin Warns Of ‘Direct’ War As U.S. Mulls Letting Ukraine Use Long-Range Western Missiles
September 13, 2024
Take Action Now “It is a question of deciding whether or not NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict,” said Russian…
Biden’s Legacy: The Decline Of Arms Control And Disarmament
September 13, 2024
Take Action Now The only remaining nuclear disarmament treaty—the New START Treaty—expires in February 2026, and there is no indication that U.S. and…
Both Presidential Candidates Agree: We Need To Stop Arresting People For Marijuana
September 12, 2024
Take Action Now Further proof that an issue once considered a political hot button has gone mainstream. By Paul Armentano, OtherWords At a time…
Here Are The Members Of Congress Invested In War
September 12, 2024
Take Action Now More than 50 members of Congress own stock in defense contractors whose profits are soaring from giant Pentagon budgets and…