After an extraordinary year of foreign policy, our Quincy Institute experts weigh in on Ukraine, Russia, China, the Middle East, and more.
It’s been an extraordinary year in foreign policy, dominated by an ongoing, brutal war following the February Russian invasion of Ukraine. NATO, struggling with its mission before 2022, appears more emboldened and unified than ever.
Meanwhile, tensions have continued to roil between the U.S. and China on a number of fronts, not the least, the fate of Taiwan.
In the Middle East, Biden’s post-Russian outreach to Saudi Arabia and inability to stop assistance to Riyadh in the Yemen war underscores the problematic nature of Washington’s relations with despotic governments there, while trying to maintain an “autocracies vs. democracies” approach to geopolitics in other parts of the world.
After two years in office, the Iran nuclear deal looks “dead,” while the U.S. slaps more sanctions on Tehran in the wake of crackdowns on protesters and reported drone transfers to Russia.
Phew.
With so much going on, we asked our own Quincy Institute experts to weigh in on the following prompt: what needs to happen almost immediately in 2023 for U.S foreign policy to start out on the right foot for the year? Why?
Recent Posts
Populism Without A Party Or Why Senator Chuck Schumer Should Not Be Majority Leader Of The Senate
Take Action Now The 2026 election was a rebuke to the GOP more than an embrace of the Democrats, a rejection of corruption, an expression of…
The Real AI Misalignment Problem Is Capitalism
Take Action Now Figures at top AI firms says that their frontier models are running out of control. It points to a problem Big Tech finds harder to…
Schumer, Jeffries Odds Rise Despite Democrats’ Push for Leadership Change
Take Action Now The Democratic coalition remains divided about whether Schumer and Jeffries, both New York Democrats, should remain party leaders, or…
Why California’s Government Isn’t Working
Take Action Now Bloated by corporate cash, let down by a rotten political system and a perversion of direct democracy, what’s the way back for a…