The Right’s perennial call for “order” doesn’t necessarily mean affirming the existing order.
By Matt McManus, In These Times
Just before the Fourth of July, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts — who helms the right-wing group most responsible for the Project 2025 plan to transform U.S. institutions and culture — made a revealing declaration. The United States, he said, is currently in the midst of a “second American Revolution,” which may or may not “remain bloodless,” depending on whether “the Left allows it to be.”
If anyone was still in doubt, Roberts’ rhetoric about revolution and mass upheaval demonstrates how the U.S. Right has always had a much more militant strain than neocons and country club Republicans acknowledge. From the John Birch Society’s conspiratorial insistence that Republican President Dwight Eisenhower was secretly a Communist stooge, to Barry Goldwater’s proclamation that “extremism in defense of liberty is no vice,” to Pat Buchanan’s declarations of “religious” and “culture war” at the 1992 Republican National Convention, plenty of high-profile right-wingers have always been willing to declare for radicalism.

In many ways the only thing Donald Trump broke was the carefully curated image of conservative moderatism that could no longer be maintained. Now, not only is what many on the Right call “counter-revolution” in the cards, but it has become the guiding philosophy of conservatism’s intellectual vanguard.
The threat of counter-revolution should not be underestimated. Despite Trump rhetorically distancing himself from the radically transformative Project 2025 and calling for unity after last month’s assassination attempt, his vice presidential pick, J.D. Vance, shows how radical the modern Right’s ambitions are. Vance’s intellectual influences read like a who’s who of modern counter-revolutionary authors. They include Patrick Deneen, who wrote an entire book calling for “regime change” and the installation of a new aristocratic conservative elite; the neo-reactionary monarchist Curtis Yarvin, who’s urged Republicans to get over their “phobia” of dictatorship; and Silicon Valley billionaire donor Peter Thiel, who’s said that democracy threatens capital and that he “no longer believe[s] that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
Recent Posts
An Obscure Military Program Helps Local Cops Buy Armored Cars And Spyware. It Might Balloon Under Trump.
October 30, 2025
Take Action Now The 1122 program, as it’s known, presents a danger to protesters facing off against militarized cops, according to a new report.By…
‘Extremely Dangerous For Humanity’: Trump Orders Resumption Of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Testing
October 30, 2025
Take Action Now “By foolishly announcing his intention resume nuclear testing,” said one expert, “Trump will trigger strong public opposition in…
The Stunning Hypocrisy Of U.S. Foreign Policy
October 29, 2025
Take Action Now The US government regards the entire world as its legitimate sphere of influence, including the backyards of its rivals.By Donald…
The Lost Language Of The Working Class: Reviving Economic Populism In The Democratic Party
October 29, 2025
Take Action Now A detailed account of the Democrats’ alienation from working America and how candidates like Dan Osborn and Zohran Mamdani point the…




