Amid the recent mass shootings, the movie sticks to its roots in glorifying guns and fighter jets.
By Thacher Schmid, The Progressive
On May 24, the same day the blockbuster “military-entertainment complex” film Top Gun: Maverick came out, a man shot and killed nineteen students and two teachers in Uvalde, Texas.
As a society, we’re obsessed with gratuitous violence in films like Maverick while being horrified by mass shootings like those in Uvalde and Buffalo, New York. And while excessive gun violence in media is only loosely connected to gun violence in real life, it does reflect the particularly American obsession with guns and might to some extent explain how they’ve become so entrenched in our national psyche.
A recent review in The New Yorker claims that Maverick is defined by a “perfect substancelessness.” That’s true, but only if we ignore all of the guns.
As a fourteen-year-old in 1986, I went with my father to see the original Top Gun, which featured a twenty-four-year-old Tom Cruise. But now Cruise is fifty-nine, and something is off. Why is he so teary-eyed? Why does he keep running full-tilt, for no reason? And why can’t I enjoy a Top Gun movie the way I used to?
Recent Posts
Abdul El-Sayed Just Said the Quiet Part Out Loud
Take Action Now View this post on Instagram A post shared by NoKings (@no_kings_usa)By Abdul…
An Evening with a Minuteman
Take Action Now The Mixed Metaphors and Messages at VandenbergBy Scott Fina, The Intercept Back on May 20, I had an opportunity to watch an…
Insurgent Candidate Victories Highlight Growing Movement Against Corporate & Elite Power: John Nichols
Take Action Now We continue to look at the results of those primary elections, with The Nation’s John Nichols calling it “a very good night for…
The Democratic party chair is a handy scapegoat. But the party’s problems are much bigger
Take Action Now Much of the criticism of Ken Martin is deserved. But his actions are symptomatic of a party that fails to listen to the grassroots…