Where will the world find refuge in 2024?
by Rebecca Gordon, Tom Dispatch
Back in 1968, my father announced that, if Richard Nixon were elected president that November, he was going to move us all to Canada. I’m not sure who “us all” actually was, since my younger brother and I were then living with my mother and my parents had been divorced for years. Still, he was determined to protect us, should someone he considered a dangerous anti-Semite make it into the Oval Office — and leaving the country seemed to him like the best way to do it.
As it happened, Nixon did win in 1968 and none of us moved to Canada. Still, I suspect my father’s confidence that, if things got too bad here, we could always head somewhere else (Canada? Israel?) was a mental refuge for him that fit his own background very well. It was, after all, what his father had done in 1910, when his family was attacked by Cossacks in what’s Ukraine today. His parents had him smuggled out of town in a horse-drawn rig under bales of hay. He then walked across a significant part of Europe and took a boat from Antwerp, Belgium, to New York City. There, he was met by a cousin who brought him to Norfolk, Virginia. Eventually, my grandfather managed to bring his whole family to Norfolk, where he became, among other things, the president of his local Zionist club, fostering his dream of refuge. My father grew up in the haze of that dream.

In fact, my father’s reliance on the guarantee that he could go “somewhere else” accorded well with the post-World War II international consensus that people in danger of persecution where they lived had a right to seek refuge in another country. Shortly after the formation of the United Nations, that view was codified in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
The Convention consolidated various treaties created by European nations to address the desperate situation of millions of people displaced by the two World Wars. It defined a refugee as a person who:
“As a result of events occurring before 1 January 1951 and owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.”
Recent Posts
Mark Carney’s Yerevan Moment: What Canada’s Presence at the EPC Summit Should Mean
May 6, 2026
Take Action Now If we’re serious about independence from American economic pressure, why are we still dependent on American technology…
Trump Escalates Military Threats in Hormuz as Iran Prepares for New Round of U.S.-Israeli Bombings and Assassinations
May 6, 2026
Take Action Now Iran believes Trump is likely to resume the war in failed quest to declare victory, a senior Iranian official told Drop SiteBy…
Five Ways The War on Terror Empowered The ICE Assault
May 5, 2026
Take Action Now We got an advance look at a new analysis from the Costs of War Project about the heritage of the 9/11 era on current ICE operations……
I Detest Billionaires – My Journey to Supporting One for Governor of California
May 4, 2026
Take Action Now Steyer’s unequivocal support of CalCare universal health coverage is one of the reasons he’s endorsed by Ro Khanna and the California…




