The five permanent members of the Security Council — notably the U.S. and Russia — use their veto power to keep wars going.
by Jon Schwarz, The Intercept
On Wednesday, the United States was the only country to vote “no” on a proposed U.N. Security Council resolution authored by Brazil that called for “humanitarian pauses” in Israel’s bombing of Gaza. Twelve countries voted for the resolution, including several surprising ones, such as France and the United Arab Emirates. Two more, Russia and the U.K., abstained. But according to the Security Council’s rules, America’s sole “no” vote meant that the resolution failed.
Human Rights Watch criticized America’s actions, saying, “Once again the U.S. cynically used their veto to prevent the U.N. Security Council from acting on Israel and Palestine at a time of unprecedented carnage.”

The Security Council has 15 countries. Ten are rotating members, elected by the U.N. General Assembly and serving on the council for a period of two years. Five are permanent members: the U.S., Russia, China, France, and the U.K. If any of the permanent members vetoes a resolution, it will not pass, no matter how many votes are in favor. This means that any of the permanent members can veto any action by the Security Council.
Recent Posts
20 Things You’re Not Supposed To Know About The War On Gaza
November 30, 2023
Take Action Now David Swanson critically examines U.S. support for the war on Gaza and unveils some of the unspoken realities of U.S. war making By…
For Media Elites, War Criminal Henry Kissinger Was A Great Man
November 30, 2023
Take Action Now All told, during his stint in government, Kissinger supervised policies that took the lives of at least 3 million people. By Norman…
Israel’s Brutality In Gaza Is Inspiring India’s Far Right
November 30, 2023
Take Action Now As the genocide in Gaza continues, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi is taking notes. by Aparna Gopalan, In These Times…
The Pentagon Just Can’t Pass An Audit
November 30, 2023
Take Action Now Conservative lawmakers calling for cuts should start with the agency that can’t account for $1.9 trillion — not the programs…