Leaders of the movement understood very well that if you can capture the courts, you can change society.
By Katherine Stewart, The Guardian
The supreme court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which reverses the constitutional abortion rights that American women have enjoyed over the past 50 years, has come as a surprise to many voters. A majority, after all, support reproductive rights and regard their abolition as regressive and barbaric.

Understood in the context of the movement that created the supreme court in its current incarnation, however, there is nothing surprising about it. In fact, it marks the beginning rather than the endpoint of the agenda this movement has in mind.
At the core of the Dobbs decision lies the conviction that the power of government can and should be used to impose a certain moral and religious vision – a supposedly biblical and regressive understanding of the Christian religion – on the population at large.
How did this conviction come to have such influence in the courts, given America’s longstanding principle of church-state separation? To understand why this is happening now, it’s important to know something about the Christian nationalist movement’s history, how its leaders chose the issue of abortion as a means of creating single-issue voters, and how they united conservatives across denominational barriers by, in effect, inventing a new form of intensely political religion.
Recent Posts
Postpone the AI Public Offerings Until Congress Acts
October 14, 2026
Take Action Now A company should not disclose a risk of catastrophe to humanity and then sell its shares to the public before any public authority…
Congress Has The Power to Fix the Trump-Saudi Nuclear Deal
October 14, 2026
Take Action Now Congress has at least 9 months and considerable leverage to make things right.By Alan J. Kuperman, Bulletin of the Atomic…
AI Doesn’t Need ‘Superintelligence’ or Evil Intent to Start a Nuclear War
October 13, 2026
Take Action Now Neither extraordinary machine intelligence nor malicious intent is required for catastrophe to result.By Paul Slovic and Herbert…
30 Months After Uproar Over Jonathan Glazer’s Oscar Speech, What Do His Pro-Israel Denouncers Say Now?
October 13, 2026
Take Action Now Given all that has happened, I recently contacted some signers of the open letter to ask whether they still fully believe in its…




