This decision came on the first day of the Court’s new term and has significant implications for the legal landscape of reproductive rights across the country.
By Alexandra Jacobo, Nation of Change
The United States Supreme Court has made a controversial move by refusing to hear a case brought by the Biden administration seeking to restore emergency abortion care protections in states with near-total abortion bans. Without providing any explanation, the Court denied a writ of certiorari on Monday, effectively allowing Texas’s stringent abortion ban to remain in place, even in emergency situations. This decision came on the first day of the Court’s new term and has significant implications for the legal landscape of reproductive rights across the country.
At the heart of the case was the Biden administration’s 2022 guidance, issued through the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which stated that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) should override state abortion bans in emergency medical situations. EMTALA, passed in 1986, requires hospitals that receive Medicare funding to provide emergency care to patients in life-threatening situations, including cases where an abortion may be necessary to save a person’s life or preserve their health.
“Any state laws or mandates that employ a more restrictive definition of an emergency medical condition are preempted by the EMTALA statute,” the HHS notice stated, reinforcing the federal government’s stance that life-saving abortion care should not be obstructed by state restrictions.
However, Texas, which has one of the nation’s strictest abortion bans, pushed back. The state argued that its law already includes a life-threatening exception, though critics argue that the language of the law is dangerously vague. Texas sued the Biden administration, claiming that federal guidance was unnecessary and infringed upon the state’s ability to regulate abortion.
A lower federal court sided with Texas, ruling that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision earlier this year, blocking the HHS guidance from being applied in Texas.
Doctors and medical professionals have expressed concern over the lack of clarity in Texas’s abortion law, fearing potential legal repercussions for providing necessary care. “There has been a spike in complaints that pregnant women in medical distress have been turned away from emergency rooms in Texas and elsewhere,” the Texas Tribune reported, underscoring the real-world consequences of the vague exceptions in the law. Physicians are now reluctant to perform procedures that have long been standard in treating severe pregnancy complications, such as sepsis or organ failure, out of fear of violating Texas’s ban.
Recent Posts
CNBC Host Doesn’t Know How to Fix Runaway Healthcare Costs. Ro Khanna Says: Medicare for All
Take Action Now As health insurance companies rake in billions in profits, the California Democrat argues that a single-payer system would help US…
Labor, Community Groups Rally Against Trump’s Threats Of An ICE Invasion
Take Action Now White House backs off—for the moment—but the community is organized and readyBy JJ Lansing, 48hills Labor leaders and community…
The Data Brokers Fueling ICE’s Deportation Machine—And The Union Shareholders Fighting Back
Take Action Now “As investors, we are thinking about this as a risk to our investments, but also as a social and ethical issue.”By Maurizio…
The Murdering Of Boaters Is Public, Not Secret
Take Action Now Murdering boaters is not legal or illegal depending on whether the emperor has called his victims “terrorists.”By David Swanson,…