A paltry number of representatives and senators in the U.S. Congress have shown interest in the Justice Department’s unprecedented prosecution of Assange. Fewer have raised their voice to oppose the political case against him.
By Kevin Gosztola, The Dissenter
A resolution in support of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on December 13.

Cosponsored by eight representatives, it states that “regular journalistic activities are protected under the First Amendment,” and the U.S. government should “drop all charges against and attempts to extradite Julian Assange.”
The resolution [PDF] introduced by six Republican and two Democratic representatives marks the second time that representatives have used the legislature to try and mobilize support for Assange and freedom of the press. (One was previously sponsored in 2020 by Republican Representatives Thomas Massie and Justin Amash and Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard.)
For over four and a half years, Assange has been jailed at His Majesty’s Prison Belmarsh. The facility is a high-security prison typically reserved for individuals accused or convicted of violent offenses.
Recent Posts
Big Systems, Bigger Profits: Consumers Are Paying the Price of Corporate Hospital Power
May 11, 2026
Take Action Now The analysis found every state dominated by a handful of system-owned hospitals, which not only charged higher rates on average but…
History of U.S.-Cuba Turmoil & the Possibility of a Full-Scale War
May 11, 2026
Take Action Now The U.S., while threatening an invasion and assassination of its leaders and/or bombing of Cuba is already conducting an act of war…
These Poor Billionaires Are Melting Down Over Taxing the Rich
May 10, 2026
Take Action Now Facing the prospect of paying a bit more in taxes, billionaires are responding calmly and rationally: by calling themselves a…
The New Jim Crow
May 9, 2026
Take Action Now What happened in Alabama on ThursdayBy Joyce Vance, Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision…




