By Farrah Hassen, LA Progressive
Regardless of anyone’s views on abortion, the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson took away a reproductive right that a half-century of hard-fought judicial precedent had determined was constitutionally protected.
In doing so, the court set a dangerous precedent — that a person’s rights can be taken away.
Overturning Roe v. Wade was a triumph of politics and ideology over constitutional principles. It diminished the power and equality of women, along with transgender men and non-binary people, to make informed decisions about their own bodies without fear of government intrusion.
The opinion itself fails as an application of long-standing constitutional law. The justices arbitrarily discarded precedents they opposed, like Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, threatening the role of precedent in ensuring legal stability.
They selectively reasoned in Dobbs that abortion law should be left to the states, but conveniently did not grant that same level of deference when they declared a New York law unconstitutional for limiting concealed weapons.
Recent Posts
Elon Musk’s Wants To Buy The U.S.’s Future
October 22, 2024
Take Action NowHere’s why Elon Musk’s million-dollar presidential lottery is ominous.By Sam Butler, Drop SiteElon Musk can…
What’s Certain About Results Of The Presidential Election
October 22, 2024
Take Action Now If Trump wins, virtually all Republicans and many Democrats in Congress will support his unequivocal backing for whatever Israel…
New Top Secret Docs Acknowledge Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Arsenal, Which Violates The Law And Should Trigger Aid Cutoff, Yet No Congress Member Acts.
October 22, 2024
Take Action Now “Benjamin Netanyahu allegedly was directly involved in an Israeli international smuggling ring that illegally acquired 800…
Why Young Working-Class Men Are More ‘Conservative’
October 21, 2024
Take Action Now It’s not just about women’s increasing power and independence—it’s about capitalism failing us all.By Sonali Kolhatkar, Economy…