Unelected judges shouldn’t have the power to take away rights most Americans support.
By Farrah Hassen, LA Progressive
Regardless of anyone’s views on abortion, the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson took away a reproductive right that a half-century of hard-fought judicial precedent had determined was constitutionally protected.

In doing so, the court set a dangerous precedent — that a person’s rights can be taken away.
Overturning Roe v. Wade was a triumph of politics and ideology over constitutional principles. It diminished the power and equality of women, along with transgender men and non-binary people, to make informed decisions about their own bodies without fear of government intrusion.
The opinion itself fails as an application of long-standing constitutional law. The justices arbitrarily discarded precedents they opposed, like Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, threatening the role of precedent in ensuring legal stability.
They selectively reasoned in Dobbs that abortion law should be left to the states, but conveniently did not grant that same level of deference when they declared a New York law unconstitutional for limiting concealed weapons.
Recent Posts
Bernie Sanders: ‘Extremely Modest’ Spending Bill Fails To Meet The Moment
August 14, 2022
Take Action Now Vermont senator says party squandered chance to be bold, and takes aim at ‘corporate Democrats’ Sinema and Manchin……
For The First Time, Medicare Will Be Able To Negotiate Drug Prices
August 14, 2022
Take Action Now We’ve been able to cap how much Medicare recipients will have to pay out of pocket each year for prescription drugs. And, drug…
Joe Manchin Isn’t Owed A Pipeline
August 13, 2022
Take Action Now Acting on climate doesn’t entitle him to the pipeline of his choice. By Bill McKibben, The Crucial…
NATO Expansion Will Not Shore Up The World Order
August 13, 2022
Take Action Now For a longterm peace, the region needs new security structures outside of the alliance that eventually include Russia.……