By Anand Gopal, The New Yorker
In the countryside, the endless killing of civilians turned women against the occupiers who claimed to be helping them. More than seventy per cent of Afghans do not live in cities. In rural areas, life under the U.S.-led coalition and its Afghan allies became pure hazard; even drinking tea in a sunlit field, or driving to your sister’s wedding, was a potentially deadly gamble.
[Gopal offers a compelling narrative as to why we should not use women’s rights as a reason to support U.S. war and occupation in the Muslim world, especially Afghanistan.]
Recent Posts
Rubio’s Paranoid Cuba Report Designed to “Justify a Military Attack on Cuba,” Says Democratic Rep.
July 26, 2026
Take Action Now Did Cuba foment Black Lives Matter and anti-ICE protests? The State Department seems to think so.By Noah Hurowitz, The Intercept A…
The State’s War on the Left Didn’t Begin With Trump — But He’s Escalating It
July 25, 2026
Take Action Now Trump’s war on the left blends “war on terror” language with Cold War McCarthyism.By Chip Gibbons, Truthout The Trump…
Autonomous Weapons: The Wave of the Future in Military Conflicts Worldwide
July 24, 2026
Take Action Now Algorithms are choosing bombing targets and are already responsible for killing civilians in some major conflict zones.By Thalif…
As Trump Denies and Delays, the World Races to Meet the Climate Clock Deadline
July 23, 2026
Take Action Now It may sound like all is lost. On the contrary: Solutions abound, and there are many reasons for hope.By Gan Golan and Andrew…




