The U.S. keeps talking about human rights—in other countries. People might start to pay attention if it closed Guantánamo, released its victims and prosecuted its employees.
By Ted Rall, Rall.com
A country that loudly and repeatedly expresses what it purports to be its principles, yet cavalierly ignores them on a whim, rightly earns the contempt of its own citizens and those of other nations, especially when the hypocritical government of that nation criticizes others for failing to adhere to their pompously proclaimed rules-based international order.

Guantánamo Bay concentration camp epitomizes this phenomenon.
Now in its third decade of operation under four presidents, Gitmo still houses 30 men. None of them has ever been charged in a court of law. Indeed, none of them ever will. It is a bedrock principle of American jurisprudence that we are all, citizens and non-citizens alike, presumed innocent until proven guilty. Which makes all 30 prisoners, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, as innocent as a newborn child as far as the law is concerned.
For whatever it’s worth, the Pentagon itself says it has no evidence that half of these people committed a crime. They are all cleared for release, but the U.S. refuses to admit them and no other country has issued an invitation.
Recent Posts
How Democrats Can End Qualified Immunity for ICE Agents
January 28, 2026
Take Action Now Democrats have a rare moment of leverage to pass legislation ending qualified immunity for Immigration and Customs Enforcement…
Save New START- Nuclear Arms Treaties Must Not Expire
January 27, 2026
Take Action Now Letting New START expire would end more than a treaty — it would end the last remaining restraint on nuclear escalation.By Leah…
The Senate Must Not Fund ICE
January 26, 2026
Take Action Now The money fueling ICE’s abuses comes directly out of the pockets of working Americans who are already struggling.By Sonali…
Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military
January 26, 2026
Take Action Now “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.”By Jon Queally, Common Dreams Despite…




