Biden officials insist there have been no changes to its policy with respect to Beijing and Taiwan, but its words and actions say otherwise.
by Daniel Larison, Responsible Statecraft
The United States is reportedly planning to increase its military presence in Taiwan from nearly 40 to between 100 and 200 military personnel.
According to the first report by The Wall Street Journal last week, the additional troops will arrive in the coming months. The small number of U.S. forces in Taiwan has been growing steadily in recent years from less than two dozen at the start of 2021 to what could be nearly ten times as many by the middle of this year. News of the larger troop presence came on the heels of a high-level meeting between U.S. and Taiwanese officials in Washington last Tuesday. There are also separate reports that 500 Taiwanese troops will be sent to the United States for combat training.

While the total numbers involved are still small, these moves represent significant increases in cooperation between the two governments and could portend larger deployments in the future. As the Journal article states, the planned increase would be “the largest deployment of forces in decades by the U.S. on Taiwan.” The United States and Taiwan have had some military cooperation and unofficial ties despite the lack of formal relations between the two, but the difference now is that these ties are becoming stronger and more visible at the same time and therefore harder for the Chinese government to ignore.
The article suggested that the administration had been trying to keep the larger troop presence out of the public eye. According to the report, the training program is one that “the Pentagon has taken pains not to publicize,” but the public also has a right to know about decisions that the government is making that increase the direct U.S. commitment to Taiwan. If the Washington is going to deploy more troops to Taiwan than it has in decades, the public should be aware of it and Congress should be asking pointed questions about the potential implications of these decisions.
Recent Posts
Japan Prepares To Sway Agenda Towards Green Development at G7 Summit
March 31, 2023
Take Action Now Transparency and accountability (on these actions) is critical, she declared. “Hiroshima represents a very critical time to…
Selective Outrage In Palestine: The Problem Is Not Just Smotrich But Zionism
March 31, 2023
Take Action Now Smotrich’s call for the destruction of Huwwara is not an alien position in Israel’s history of ethnic cleansing and “incremental…
US Companies Complain Of Worker Shortages While US Deports Workers To Their Deaths
March 31, 2023
Take Action Now We militarize our borders and keep people seeking work from doing it. Then legislators insist we need child labor to fill a “worker…
Bernie Sanders Vs. Howard Schultz: Longtime Starbucks CEO Grilled On Company’s Union-Busting Tactics
March 30, 2023
Take Action Now Bernie Sanders grilled the former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz about the company’s illegal anti-union practices by Amy…