A Minnesota judge ruled that criminalizing Enbridge Line 3 water protectors would be a crime.
by Alleen Brown, Exposed by CMD
In a remarkable ruling last Thursday, a Minnesota judge summarily dismissed misdemeanor charges against three Anishinaabe water protectors who had protested at a pipeline construction site in an effort to stop the Enbridge Line 3 tar sands oil pipeline. “To criminalize their behavior would be the crime,” she concluded.
Judge Leslie Metzen relied on a rarely used Minnesota statute that allows a judge to dismiss a case if doing so furthers “justice.” She assessed that in this case justice meant throwing out charges against Anishinaabe people committed to preserving their treaty lands. “The court finds that it is within the furtherance of justice to protect the defendants peacefully protesting to protect the land and water,” she wrote.
“I’ve never seen a judge dismiss a case in the name of justice,” said Claire Glenn, a staff attorney at the Climate Defense Project, who was part of the defense team for the water protectors. She said that research undertaken by the legal team found very few cases where the statute had been cited previously.
Recent Posts
Genocide Lawsuits Against Democrats Foreshadow 2026 Primary Challenges
January 19, 2025
Take Action NowA move to sue lawmakers who abetted genocide is gaining momentum ahead of 2026.By Norman Solomon, The HillMore…
Trump’s Greenland Gambit Accelerates A New Cold War
January 17, 2025
Take Action NowAs the president-elect’s call to buy—or take—a sovereign country moves from punchline to possibility, a look at the real…
Biden Worked Around The Clock — To Prevent A Ceasefire
January 17, 2025
Take Action NowTime to acknowledge that the president chose the circumstances that led to US complicity.By Trita Parsi,…
New Poll Shows Kamala Harris Paid For Backing Gaza Genocide
January 16, 2025
Take Action Now“Israel is a liability,” said one Palestinian-American rights advocate.By Julia Conley, Common Dreams……