Organizations demand the Transportation Secretary revisit a repealed brake safety rule, or else they “will consider taking legal action.”
By Rebecca Burns, The Lever
Six environmental groups will consider legal action if the Department of Transportation fails to act on a key rail safety rule, the groups wrote Thursday in a letter to Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

The rule in question would force railroads to begin upgrading freight trains’ Civil War-era braking systems to newer, electronically controlled brakes allowing for faster and safer stops. In 2017, after rail industry donors delivered more than $6 million to GOP campaigns, President Donald Trump’s administration repealed the 2015 rule requiring the newer brakes in some trains transporting hazardous materials, as The Lever reported last week.
In 2018, environmental groups, including Earthjustice and the Sierra Club, appealed the move by the Trump administration, citing a faulty cost-benefit analysis used to justify the repeal. An investigation earlier that year from the Associated Press revealed that the Trump administration omitted at least $117 million in estimated damages from train derailments when it determined that the costs of upgrading electronic braking systems would exceed the benefits.
Recent Posts
How Democrats Can End Qualified Immunity for ICE Agents
January 28, 2026
Take Action Now Democrats have a rare moment of leverage to pass legislation ending qualified immunity for Immigration and Customs Enforcement…
Save New START- Nuclear Arms Treaties Must Not Expire
January 27, 2026
Take Action Now Letting New START expire would end more than a treaty — it would end the last remaining restraint on nuclear escalation.By Leah…
The Senate Must Not Fund ICE
January 26, 2026
Take Action Now The money fueling ICE’s abuses comes directly out of the pockets of working Americans who are already struggling.By Sonali…
Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military
January 26, 2026
Take Action Now “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.”By Jon Queally, Common Dreams Despite…




