A move to sue lawmakers who abetted genocide is gaining momentum ahead of 2026.
By Norman Solomon, The Hill
More than 800 Americans in Northern California have now joined in a class-action lawsuit against their Democratic congressional representatives, charging them with illegally helping to provide weapons to Israel for use in committing genocide in Gaza. News of the suit has caused a stir in the Bay Area, with media coverage putting the pair, Rep. Jared Huffman and Rep. Mike Thompson, on the defensive.
Legal experts may be correct that the suit is destined to be thrown out of court. The judicial branch has rarely been willing to interfere with the foreign policy decisions of the legislative or executive branch, and issues like legal standing and the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause have routinely shielded legislators. But harping on the steep uphill climb for the lawsuit — and others like it now being prepared by plaintiffs elsewhere in the country — misses the political point.
I decided to join the lawsuit as a plaintiff and to help publicize it because I think that even if the action loses in court, it will win in public discourse. And that will, justifiably, make the congressional defendants the losers.
Like other plaintiffs in the Northern California case, I believe that our lawsuit is on solid ground of justice. The arms shipments to Israel’s military have violated the Constitution, the U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide and U.S. federal laws — including the Leahy law, which prohibits the government from “using funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces where there is credible information implicating that unit in the commission of gross violations of human rights.” The namesake of the law, former Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), says it is being violated.
In effect, by enabling approval of $26.38 billion in military aid to Israel last spring, 366 members of the House voted to force constituents into being complicit in genocide. No amount of rhetoric can change that overarching reality. And no amount of legalistic arguments will deflect the profound effects that moral revulsion can have on politics.
Recent Posts
Ending the Trump-Netanyahu War in the Middle East
Take Action Now If not stopped soon, this war could easily turn into a global conflagration, effectively into World War III.By Jeffrey D. Sachs…
Why We Have to Fight Back Against ICE Protesters’ Terror Convictions
Take Action Now Since his first inauguration, Trump has been throwing charges at protesters and seeing what sticks. He always failed — until now.…
Years of Meddling in Cuba and Nicaragua
Take Action Now The National Endowment for Democracy is willing to go rogue in pursuit of regime change.Edward Hunt, Foreign Policy in Focus The…
“A Sense of Despair”: Many Iranians Fear a Prolonged War — and What Comes After
Take Action Now It’s not just about environmental rollbacks: Trump and Lee Zeldin have presided over a striking decline in the EPA enforcing existing…