The words we use to describe war and foreign policy matter, and they have far reaching implications for policymaking.
From George Orwell’s critique of the language of totalitarian regimes to today, discussions of war and foreign policy have been full of dehumanizing euphemisms, bloodless jargon, little-known government acronyms, and troubling metaphors that hide warfare’s damage.
Think of “collateral damage” (civilian deaths), “overseas contingency operations” (wars), and “bug splat” (killing human beings with drone-fired missiles).
This guide aims to help people write and talk about war and foreign policy more accurately, more honestly, and in ways people outside the elite Washington, DC foreign policy “blob” can understand.
We encourage you to use this guide, to share it with others, and to adapt it as necessary to local contexts. The guide should be especially helpful to journalists and other writers, podcasters and vloggers, policy analysts, teachers, scholars, and people involved in public education projects.
Recent Posts
25 Years of War Was the Wrong Response to 9/11
Take Action Now Both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for these counter-productive choices, and the appalling human costs of these wars on…
How Status Quo Democrats Could Create Another Trump
Take Action Now A new study suggests Democrats’ broken promises won’t just cost them elections — they could fuel an even more dangerous MAGA…
The Pentagon Asked OpenAI for Artificial Intelligence Designed to Rarely Say No
Take Action Now The U.S. military’s desire for an AI tool with “minimal refusal rates” was revealed through a FOIA lawsuit filed by The Intercept.…
Real History: After 9/11, the ‘War on Terror’ Was a War of Terror
Take Action Now Through it all, the ongoing war effort that began in autumn 2001 had an implicit throughline in dominant media and politics: while…