Wars harm climate action because large militaries emit a lot and military spending diverts money away from tackling climate change
By Nick Buxton and Deborah Burton, Climate Change News
The failure of the richest countries to meet their 2009 commitment to provide $100 billion in climate finance to impoverished and climate vulnerable countries has long sowed distrust and hindered climate negotiations.
The broken promise is even more stark, given President Biden’s request to Congress this October for $105 billion additional funding to pay for Israel’s devastating war on Gaza and to support Ukraine against Russia.
Resources that never materialise to address the climate emergency seem to be easily available when it comes to supporting wars. As we approach the UN climate talks in Dubai, the impact of war and the military on the climate can no longer be ignored.
Big Emitters
The failure to assess the military contribution to climate change historically is partly deliberate.
The US government in 1997 said it would only sign the Kyoto agreement if the military were explicitly exempted from reporting and reducing emissions.
Recent Posts
How Democrats Can End Qualified Immunity for ICE Agents
Take Action Now Democrats have a rare moment of leverage to pass legislation ending qualified immunity for Immigration and Customs Enforcement…
Save New START- Nuclear Arms Treaties Must Not Expire
Take Action Now Letting New START expire would end more than a treaty — it would end the last remaining restraint on nuclear escalation.By Leah…
The Senate Must Not Fund ICE
Take Action Now The money fueling ICE’s abuses comes directly out of the pockets of working Americans who are already struggling.By Sonali…
Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military
Take Action Now “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.”By Jon Queally, Common Dreams Despite…