Wars harm climate action because large militaries emit a lot and military spending diverts money away from tackling climate change
By Nick Buxton and Deborah Burton, Climate Change News
The failure of the richest countries to meet their 2009 commitment to provide $100 billion in climate finance to impoverished and climate vulnerable countries has long sowed distrust and hindered climate negotiations.
The broken promise is even more stark, given President Biden’s request to Congress this October for $105 billion additional funding to pay for Israel’s devastating war on Gaza and to support Ukraine against Russia.
Resources that never materialise to address the climate emergency seem to be easily available when it comes to supporting wars. As we approach the UN climate talks in Dubai, the impact of war and the military on the climate can no longer be ignored.
Big Emitters
The failure to assess the military contribution to climate change historically is partly deliberate.
The US government in 1997 said it would only sign the Kyoto agreement if the military were explicitly exempted from reporting and reducing emissions.
Recent Posts
To Tax the Ultra-Rich, We Need to Go After Their Wealth—Not Just Income
Take Action Now Two proposals—one in California, one in Congress—could finally do it. The alternative is an ever-more-powerful billionaire class that…
DNC Shoots Down Resolutions Calling Out AIPAC and Limiting Arms to Israel
Take Action Now The party just kicked the can down the road again on Israel, deepening the divide between party members and their leaders.By Matt…
Tax Day 2026: The Average Taxpayer Paid $4,049 for War and Weapons
Take Action Now Wars don’t just cost taxpayers at the pump. Here’s what the average taxpayer spent for different priorities in 2025By…
Bombshell Report Reveals Trump Was Begging for Iran to Join Ceasefire
Take Action Now This contradicts everything the president has said about the war.By Malcolm Ferguson, The New Republic Recent reporting from the…