Ordinary Ukrainians on the front lines are divided on a ceasefire and negotiations
By Gerard Toal, The Irish Times
Talking peace is not popular in Ukraine right now. Given the context this is understandable. Russia is terrorising Ukrainians in their homes with missiles and drones. Its attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure – its electricity grid, water and heat systems – threaten millions with a cold, dark winter. This follows the brazen annexation of four Ukrainian regions. No one forgets the Russian military’s war crimes against civilians. Russian officials talk peace because they want to consolidate their territorial gains. Ukraine scorns peace now because it has momentum on the battlefield. It wants the peace of the victorious.

It has always been the case that the more Ukraine wins on the battlefield, the more dangerous this geopolitical crisis becomes. Russian president Vladimir Putin cannot countenance losing and has made nuclear threats that US president Joe Biden, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and French president Emmanuel Macron acknowledged are serious. Biden was blunt about the danger: “I don’t think there is any such a thing as the ability to easily use a tactical weapon and not end up with Armageddon.” Yet, as we approach this frightening prospect, talking peace has become taboo.
Last March, Zelenskiy offered to talk directly with Putin. Now, in the wake of Putin’s annexation of yet more Ukrainian territory, Zelenskiy signed a decree banning direct talks with Russia until it has a new leader. Regime change in Russia, it seems, is now a precondition for Ukraine coming to the negotiating table.
Zelenskiy’s stance may be morally justified but it locks Ukraine, and its supporters, into what looks like endless war for perfect peace. Officially the United States, Kyiv’s biggest backer, is content to let the Ukrainians decide if and when negotiations should occur. A senior state department official told the Washington Post recently: “Our job now is to help them be in absolutely the best position militarily on the battlefield . . . for that day when they do choose to go to the diplomatic table.”
Recent Posts
‘People in Venezuela Can Oppose the Government But Still Reject US Intervention’:
January 18, 2026
Take Action Now CounterSpin interview with Michelle Ellner on Venezuela invasionBy Janine Jackson, FAIR Janine Jackson interviewed CODEPINK’s…
Social Strikes: Confronting ICE and Resisting Authoritarianism
January 17, 2026
Take Action Now An in-depth discussion with Jeremy Brecher on the strategy, potential, and challenges of mass social strikes following the Minnesota…
Israeli Ban on 37 Aid Organizations Expected to Have Devastating Impacts Across Palestine
January 16, 2026
Take Action Now Aid organizations say Israel’s recent ban of 37 groups has dealt a severe blow to humanitarian work across Palestine. In Gaza, it…
U.S. Surging Military Assets To the Middle East To Prepare for War With Iran After Trump Postpones Attack
January 16, 2026
Take Action Now Reports claim that Netanyahu asked Trump to delay the attack as Israel wants more time to prepare for counterattacksBy Dave…




