Pentagon considers a quick-reaction force to deploy in US cities amid unrest, raising legal and political concerns.
By Rachel Leingang, The Guardian
Donald Trump could expand the use of national guard troops in US cities even further, if a plan from the Pentagon comes to fruition.
The Washington Post, reporting on internal documents on Tuesday, says Pentagon officials are “evaluating plans” to create a “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force” that would deploy to crack down on cities in events of unrest or during protests.
The newly revealed plans come as Trump has used the national guard in ways beyond the norm. He deployed troops to Los Angeles against the state and city’s wishes to tamp down protests against immigration enforcement, and sent troops to Washington DC and took over the local police citing allegedly increased crime.
The Department of Defense would not weigh in directly on the idea of a “reaction force”.

“The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe,” a defense official said in a statement to the Guardian. “We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.”
In the documents, the Post reports, it calls for 600 troops to be placed at the ready at military bases in Alabama and Arizona, able to deploy quickly if called. This force could cost “hundreds of millions of dollars”. The documents have timestamps from late July and early August, though they are marked as “pre-decisional”.
The plan, if implemented, would be an expansion of the use of troops in US cities and is legally questionable. National guard troops are frequently deployed in their states to respond to disasters and, particularly in 2020, to civil unrest, when many states called on their units to deploy amid protests over police brutality.
Hina Shamsi, the director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, said in a statement that the move would be a “breathtakingly dangerous power grab”.
“Sending armed troops into cities to suppress protest should be a non-starter in any healthy democracy, but especially in a country founded on a strong presumption against the military policing civilians,” Shamsi said. “The right to protest is core to the constitution and who we are as a nation, yet the Trump administration seems ready to betray our basic values in order to muzzle political expression across the country.”
Recent Posts
Should Jon Stewart Run For President In 2028?
August 13, 2025
Take Action Now I was skeptical about a Stewart candidacy, but maybe ‘The Daily Show’ host is the right person to shake up the Democratic…
The Democrats Were Designed For An America That No Longer Exists
August 12, 2025
Take Action Now If the Democratic Party, and the country, want to survive, they need to wake up and choose what they want the next world to look…
Ukraine: We Told You So
August 12, 2025
Take Action Now “Helping Ukraine” has done exactly what we said shipping weapons to a slaughterhouse would do. It has hurt Ukraine.By David…
Think Democrats Couldn’t Have Done Anything To Stop Trump’s DC Takeover? Think Again
August 12, 2025
Take Action Now Democrats could have protected DC by granting statehood when they had the chance.By Sam Rosenthal On Monday, August 11th, Donald…