The New York Times and others are credulously repeating false narratives about purported advocacy for genocide on college campuses.
by Ari Paul, FAIR
University presidents are under fire from politicians and the media over what is being framed as their waffling over allowing antisemitic speech on their campuses. But it is a concocted outrage that has nothing to do with safeguarding Jewish students, and the New York Times is going along for the ride.
The uproar concerns an appearance by the presidents of Harvard, MIT and the University of Pennsylvania before the House Education committee, in which Rep. Elise Stefanik (R–NY) grilled them about antisemitism on campus and whether “calling for the genocide of Jews” violates university codes of conduct.

The Times (12/6/23) reported the story under the headline, “College Presidents Under Fire After Dodging Questions About Antisemitism,” with the subhead: “The leaders of Harvard, MIT and Penn appeared to evade questions about whether students should be disciplined if they call for the genocide of Jews.” Reporters Stephanie Saul and Anemona Hartocollis began:
Support for the presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and MIT eroded quickly on Wednesday, after they seemed to evade what seemed like a rather simple question during a contentious congressional hearing: Would they discipline students calling for the genocide of Jews?
Specifically, the reporters wrote, the presidents’ “lawyerly replies”—that it depends on the context of the speech—drew criticism from Jewish leaders as well as Democratic bigwigs, thus framing the ire not as partisan positioning against liberal academia, but a categorical defense of Jewish students against uncaring administrators.
But there are two big problems with the Times‘ framing: The calls for genocide were imaginary, and the presidents’ answers were not evasive, they were accurate reflections of the constitutional protections of free speech and the scope of university policies on harassment and bullying.
Recent Posts
Sanders Demands Democrats Ban Super PAC Spending in Primaries After AIPAC Blitz
August 11, 2026
Take Action Now AIPAC is reportedly slated to spend tens of millions opposing Abdul El-Sayed and backing his Republican opponent.By Sharon Zhang ,…
Willie Nelson Gets It—This Time About Data Centers
August 11, 2026
Take Action Now “The last thing we need is a loud, water thieving, light polluting, data center anywhere near our town (or any others for that…
After Blocking Fuel, U.S. Turns to Cuba’s Food Supply
August 10, 2026
Take Action Now The Trump administration has already cut off Cuba’s access to oil. Now it’s attempting to starve the Cuban people, targeting the…
‘Voters Are Fed Up’: Michigan Primary Forces Democratic Party to Accept Leftwing Shift
August 10, 2026
Take Action Now With Abdul El-Sayed’s win, the party’s leftwing insurgency had breached the walls of a midwestern swing state, forcing a reckoning…




