The kind of progressivism that people expect from the Democratic Party has been subsumed by another politics.
By Brandan P. Buck, Responsible Statecraft
“What’s happened to the Democrats? They used to be antiwar!” Such is one of the many questions being bandied about byan online commentariat seeking to make sense of a litany of Republican endorsements of Kamala Harris, many of them made by party elites known for their hawkish foreign policy like former Wyoming Representative Liz Cheney and former Vice President Dick Cheney.
One could find similar consternation withAmerican liberals’ support for U.S. involvement in the Ukraine crisis. The confusion is based primarily on nostalgia, a selective view of history that obscures the Democratic Party’s longer, more complicated relationship with interventionism.

The reality is quite different: what we are witnessing is the latest iteration of an ongoing intraparty struggle where the dominant liberal interventionist core asserts itself over a smaller progressive noninterventionist periphery. While the latter often dominates popular conceptions of the Democratic Party and its vision for American foreign affairs, the former drives the reality of party politics.
This has been happening since the First World War, best encapsulated bythe public debate betweenColumbia professor John Dewey and one of his students, writer Randolph Bourne. While both were considered liberals of a progressive stripe, they maintained opposing views on American entry into Europe’s conflagration.
Known for his adherence to philosophical pragmatism, Dewey asserted that the war could save the world from German militarism and be used to shepherd theAmerican political economy toward a fairer, managed state. Bourne rejected this notion and argued that American entry into the war would undermine the egalitarianism of the larger progressive project and create a labyrinth of bureaucraciesthat would undermine democracy.
While Dewey’s arguments held sway as the United States entered the war, American involvement in Europe’s quarrel, compounded by civil rights abuses at home, proved Bourne posthumously correct.
Despite succumbing to the Spanish Flu in 1918, Bourne’s views of the war, bolstered by the posthumous publication of a collection of essays entitledUntimely Papers, found fertile soil in an American society horrified by the conflict. Chastened by the realities of the Western Front, interwar progressivism took on asolid strain of pacifism and opposition to centralized authority.
Recent Posts
White House Responds With ‘Authoritarian Propaganda’ as Judge Blocks National Guard in Portland
October 5, 2025
Take Action Now A federal judge in Oregon found that the White House’s claims about “war-ravaged” Portland were “untethered to facts,” and that the…
California Vows to ‘Instantly’ Cut Funding to Universities That Cave to Trump ‘Compact’
October 4, 2025
Take Action Now California Governor Gavin Newsom urges schools not to sign the ‘radical agreement’ Trump has proposed to impose cuts to departments,…
Hundreds Of Celebrities Relaunch McCarthy-Era Committee To Defend Free Speech
October 3, 2025
Take Action Now “The McCarthy Era ended when Americans from across the political spectrum finally came together and stood up for the principles…
The Trump ‘Peace Plan’ Is Itself A War Crime
October 3, 2025
Take Action Now It’s illegal to use civilian lives as leverage.By RJ Eskow, The Zero Hour Report Much has been written and debated since…