Leaders of the movement understood very well that if you can capture the courts, you can change society.
By Katherine Stewart, The Guardian
The supreme court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which reverses the constitutional abortion rights that American women have enjoyed over the past 50 years, has come as a surprise to many voters. A majority, after all, support reproductive rights and regard their abolition as regressive and barbaric.

Understood in the context of the movement that created the supreme court in its current incarnation, however, there is nothing surprising about it. In fact, it marks the beginning rather than the endpoint of the agenda this movement has in mind.
At the core of the Dobbs decision lies the conviction that the power of government can and should be used to impose a certain moral and religious vision – a supposedly biblical and regressive understanding of the Christian religion – on the population at large.
How did this conviction come to have such influence in the courts, given America’s longstanding principle of church-state separation? To understand why this is happening now, it’s important to know something about the Christian nationalist movement’s history, how its leaders chose the issue of abortion as a means of creating single-issue voters, and how they united conservatives across denominational barriers by, in effect, inventing a new form of intensely political religion.
Recent Posts
To Resist Trump, The Left Must Change, A Zero Hour Conversation With Norman Solomon
May 9, 2025
Take Action Now Norman Solomon and RJ Eskow discuss the challenges facing the Democratic Party and the need for a united front against the Trump…
An AI Dragnet Is Sweeping Up Immigrants
May 9, 2025
Take Action Now The U.S. government is activating a suite of algorithmic surveillance tools, developed in concert with major tech companies, to…
The ADL Has Been Going To Bat For Weapons Manufacturers
May 9, 2025
Take Action Now The Anti-Defamation League now says criticizing the use of US weapons is ‘antisemitic’.By Eli Clifton, Responsible…
America First? No, Corporations First.
May 8, 2025
Take Action Now Big corporations donated heavily to Trump’s inaugural fund. Just a few months later, federal cases against them are being dropped.…