A city is forever changed, and so is residents’ relationship with their water. The betrayal of trust by the institutions meant to protect Flint’s residents has made some of them extra cautious as they look to keep themselves and their community safe.
by Anna Clark and Sarahbeth Maney, ProPublica
Flint, Michigan, is less than 70 miles from the Great Lakes, the most abundant fresh water on the face of the planet. It’s laced with creeks and a broad river that bears its name. Yet in 2014, Flint’s drinking water became a threat — not because of scarcity, or a natural disaster, or even a familiar tale of corporate pollution.
Ten years ago this spring, public officials made catastrophic changes in the city’s water source and treatment, then used testing practices that hid dangers. As problems emerged, they failed to appropriately change course. Residents raised repeated concerns about the color, odor and taste of the water but struggled to get a sufficiently serious response, especially from state and federal authorities.
It didn’t help that the distressed city was under the authority of state-appointed emergency managers, an unusually expansive oversight system that residents decried. For a crucial period of about 3 1/2 years, local decision-making was not accountable to voters. The result: excess exposure to toxic lead, bacteria and a disinfection byproduct in Flint’s drinking water. An outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease sickened 90 people and killed 12. (The toll is likely higher, as Frontline documented.) The water, now drawn from the Flint River, wasn’t treated with corrosion control — a violation of federal law — so the pipes deteriorated more every day.
At one point, saying the water damaged its machinery, a General Motors plant switched to another community’s system. Flint’s emergency manager and other officials still insisted that nothing was seriously wrong with the water. But if the water was harming machines, many wondered, what was it doing to people?
Recent Posts
25 Years of War Was the Wrong Response to 9/11
Take Action Now Both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for these counter-productive choices, and the appalling human costs of these wars on…
How Status Quo Democrats Could Create Another Trump
Take Action Now A new study suggests Democrats’ broken promises won’t just cost them elections — they could fuel an even more dangerous MAGA…
The Pentagon Asked OpenAI for Artificial Intelligence Designed to Rarely Say No
Take Action Now The U.S. military’s desire for an AI tool with “minimal refusal rates” was revealed through a FOIA lawsuit filed by The Intercept.…
Real History: After 9/11, the ‘War on Terror’ Was a War of Terror
Take Action Now Through it all, the ongoing war effort that began in autumn 2001 had an implicit throughline in dominant media and politics: while…