The company quietly told investors that its profits are threatened by its public crusade against the labor movement.
By David Sirota, The Lever
As Starbucks tries to crush a growing union drive among its workers, the company’s executives quietly admitted to investors that their anti-labor activities may destroy the coffee giant’s profits.
In the fine print of the company’s recent government filings, Starbucks first admits that “our wages and benefits programs may be insufficient,” but then slams unions, saying if labor organizing is successful “our labor costs could increase and our business could be negatively affected.”
Then the company made a stunning admission: “Our responses to any union organizing efforts could negatively impact how our brand is perceived and have adverse effects on our business, including on our financial results.”
Starbucks’ billionaire CEO Howard Schultz has been spearheading a public crusade to stop unionization…
Recent Posts
Anyone Noting Israel’s Crimes Will Be Accused of “Blood Libel”
Take Action Now Genocide apologists have declared the New York Times’s Nicholas Kristof’s report on Israeli soldiers’ rape of Palestinians is “blood…
Trump’s War on Iran Is a Symptom of Unchecked US Military Power
Take Action Now Virtually everyone killed by the US during the “war on terror” has been a person of color, writer Norman Solomon says.By George…
How to Stop Mega Gerrymandering From Scrambling Democracy
Take Action Now If the Democrats wake up, fire their profiteering consultants, and run on a specific “Compact for America,” they could landslide the…
Why is the Democratic Party Still Hiding its 2024 Election Autopsy?
Take Action Now No one has more at stake than Kamala Harris – who has ‘signaled’ support for its release without saying so publiclyBy Norman…