Starbucks says it wants to bargain. Its behavior suggests otherwise.
by Steven Greenhouse, In These Times
Starbucks received lots of favorable press when it told its workers’ union that it wanted to resume contract talks. The move was a much-needed PR boost for a company whose recent battles with the union have stirred bad press and contributed to sinking stock prices. A top Starbucks official wrote to the union’s president on Friday saying the company wanted to end the bargaining impasse — one caused by the coffee chain’s refusal to hold any negotiating sessions for more than six months. As a result of that refusal, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has repeatedly accused Starbucks of failing to bargain in good faith.
But there’s a very important caveat in Starbucks’ Friday letter that calls into question whether it is truly sincere about wanting to return to the bargaining table. In that letter, Starbucks continued to reject the idea of hybrid negotiations – the reason it has repeatedly blocked negotiations for many months. Sara Kelly, Starbucks’s vice president and chief partner officer, insisted in the letter that negotiations be conducted “without video or audio feeds.” In other words, Starbucks’ message is, “We’re saying we want to resume negotiations, but we will do so only if the union surrenders to us on this important hybrid bargaining issue.”

That doesn’t seem like a conducive way or sincere way to resume contract talks.
Starbucks has halted all bargaining by refusing to participate in hybrid negotiating sessions in which some unionized baristas would meet face to face with Starbucks’ bargaining team while other baristas would join the bargaining session via Zoom. The union, Starbucks Workers United, has insisted on hybrid bargaining, saying that some baristas simply don’t have the time or money to attend bargaining sessions in person. The union also repeatedly points out that in early 2022 Starbucks and its lawyers conducted some bargaining sessions via Zoom because of the pandemic, but the company later reversed itself and refused to do bargaining that includes any Zoom participants.
Recent Posts
Why California’s Government Isn’t Working
November 9, 2026
Take Action Now Bloated by corporate cash, let down by a rotten political system and a perversion of direct democracy, what’s the way back for a…
10 Reasons Hakeem Jeffries Should Not Be the Next Speaker of the House
November 9, 2026
Take Action Now More than any single vote, contribution, or appointment, the problem with Hakeem Jeffries is the establishment politics he…
More Pressure Needed to STOP the Trump EGO Arch
November 8, 2026
Take Action Now Representative Don Beyers from Northern Virginia already has 80 co-sponsors of House Resolution H.R. 9047 to stop the Arch. Call…
I’m the psychiatrist who warned the world about Trump. Here’s why I fear what comes next
November 8, 2026
Take Action Now After the Republicans’ crushing midterm defeat, forensic psychiatrist Dr Bandy X Lee says Donald Trump could lash out in an attempt…




