Rail workers are preparing to vote down an agreement that narrowly averted a work stoppage in September.
by Michelle Chen, The Progressive Magazine
In mid-September, the nation’s railway carriers were locked in tense negotiations with several rail labor unions, and a rail strike—a potential economic catastrophe for the country and global supply chains—loomed on the horizon.
In the final days before the strike deadline, the Department of Labor intervened through an arbitration process under an emergency panel commissioned by the White House. An eleventh-hour tentative agreement emerged days later, narrowly averting a work stoppage for SMART Transportation Division, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, and the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, which represent about 60,000 workers together (several other rail unions had negotiated similar contract proposals earlier). But the rail workers still have a long way to go in their struggle for a fair contract; many workers are unsatisfied with the proposed agreement and say they will vote it down, and the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen voted October 26 to reject the proposed deal.
The main frustrations workers have commonly expressed center largely around a stressful on-call scheduling system; many say unpredictable schedules, combined with understaffing, undermine their family lives and make it difficult even to take sick leave without being penalized.
Railroad Workers United, a rank-and-file group representing workers from multiple unions and trades in the industry, has urged members to vote down the tentative agreement, stating that it “does nothing to address nor rectify the underlying causes of worker disillusionment and dissatisfaction with their working conditions. Short staffing, long hours, harsh attendance policies, poor scheduling practices, a lack of time off work, and a generally inferior quality of work life would continue under this contract if ratified.”
Recent Posts
Pro-Palestine Students, Faculty Sue UC Santa Cruz Over ‘Unconstitutional’ Ban
Take Action Now The lawsuit was filed “to vindicate the fundamental democratic and constitutional rights to free speech, free assembly, and due…
The Israeli And U.S. Governments Know The Name Of The Israeli Soldier Who Assassinated Peace Activist Aysengur Eygi
Take Action Now As someone who spent 29 years in the U.S. Army, I know the Israeli military knows the names of all of its snipers, just as the U.S.…
Kamala Harris Should Do What Joe Biden Won’t: Commit To Actually Reining In Israel
Take Action Now Harris doesn’t need to impose a full embargo on Israel – but she can pledge to enforce US laws restricting arms transfers to human…
60 Years After Lyndon Johnson’s “Daisy Ad,” The Silence On Nuclear War Is Dangerous
Take Action Now When Harris delivered her acceptance speech, it did not include the words “atomic” or “nuclear” at all. By Norman Solomon One…