Lockheed Martin is the largest military contractor with the Department of Defense, the world’s largest institutional consumer of fossil fuels. Lockheed was recently asked point-blank if it will address its role in worsening climate change. Its answer: no.
by Danaka Katovich and David Gibson, Jacobin
Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest military contractor, will have its shareholder meeting on April 27. There, shareholders are slated to vote on a resolution to require a company report “disclosing how the Company intends to reduce its full value chain greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C degree goal requiring Net Zero emissions by 2050.” The board at Lockheed advised all their shareholders to vote against this resolution, making it clear that in addition to promoting conflict and violence around the world, Lockheed Martin is also uninterested in scaling back its significant contribution to climate change.
In the board’s reasoning, shareholders should vote no on the resolution because it is “premature and not in the best interest of our Company or our stockholders.” To suggest that acting on the unfolding climate catastrophe is “premature” speaks volumes about the lack of urgency Lockheed executives see around the climate crisis. According to a recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the threshold for critical changes in the climate will likely happen within this decade. The report emphasizes that we must make an immediate shift away from fossil fuels to prevent climate collapse. The idea that any action on climate change is premature is a blatant falsehood at worst or willfully ignorant at best.

As we face the stark reality of looming climate disaster, the board’s statement is a candid admission of Lockheed executives’ values. From this, one can truly determine that they value profit over everything else — in case that weren’t clear from, say, the slaughter of forty Yemeni schoolchildren with a Lockheed Martin–manufactured bomb, or countless other horrific acts of violence routinely committed with the company’s profitable products.
Recent Posts
How Democrats Can End Qualified Immunity for ICE Agents
January 28, 2026
Take Action Now Democrats have a rare moment of leverage to pass legislation ending qualified immunity for Immigration and Customs Enforcement…
Save New START- Nuclear Arms Treaties Must Not Expire
January 27, 2026
Take Action Now Letting New START expire would end more than a treaty — it would end the last remaining restraint on nuclear escalation.By Leah…
The Senate Must Not Fund ICE
January 26, 2026
Take Action Now The money fueling ICE’s abuses comes directly out of the pockets of working Americans who are already struggling.By Sonali…
Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military
January 26, 2026
Take Action Now “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.”By Jon Queally, Common Dreams Despite…




