In recent days the Vice President has quickly ditched some of her boldest initiatives, needlessly making herself look unprincipled.
By Alex Skopic and Nathan J. Robinson, Current Affairs
Kamala Harris has been renouncing progressive positions one-by-one. During her short-lived 2019 presidential campaign, Harris was a supporter of single-payer healthcare, a fracking ban, and a federal jobs guarantee. No longer. On July 26th, a campaign official told the Hill that Harris “will not seek to ban fracking if she’s elected,” even though she had previously said there was “no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.” The following day, CNN reported that “the vice president no longer supports a single-payer health care system,” despite having co-sponsored Bernie Sanders’ Medicare for All bill back in 2017. And on July 31, a Washington Examiner exclusive revealed that Harris has “changed her position” on a federal jobs guarantee—a component of the Green New Deal she backed in 2019—and no longer supports that either.
This is bad politics. In the 2004 presidential election, one of the dominant charges against John Kerry was that he was a “flip-flopper,” meaning he had opportunistically changed his positions for political convenience. (Republicans even made actual flip-flops listing the issues he’d been on both sides of: “For” on the left foot, “Against” on the right.) Brazenly changing your positions like this implies that you don’t actually believe in the things you say you believe in, and makes it very hard for voters to trust that what you’re saying at any given time is what you truly think.

Moreover, moving to the right on policy will not prevent Trump and his proxies from attacking Harris as “dangerously liberal,” a line they’ve already started using. This is a lesson Democrats should have learned in the Obama years. No matter how much Barack Obama tried to portray himself as a reasonable centrist and make compromises with Republicans, he was still attacked as a “socialist” whose healthcare plans would lead to “death panels.” Today, the GOP is not going to suddenly say “Well, I guess we should stop attacking Harris as a radical.” But her abrupt U-turns on policy will allow them to deploy a second line of attack, namely that she’s untrustworthy and doesn’t keep a consistent position on anything, which wouldn’t be wrong.
Recent Posts
88 Corporations That Paid No US Federal Income Tax in 2025 Spent $852 Million on Recent Lobbying, Elections
June 13, 2026
Take Action Now “The result,” said the author of a new Public Citizen analysis, “is a self-reinforcing loop where corporate cash buys policy, and…
Gaza is Not an Aberration – Israel Planned This Genocide Decades Ago
June 12, 2026
Take Action Now In October 2023, Israel found an excuse to breathe new life into an old story of slaughter and expulsion. The chief differences this…
Top Pentagon Official Admits Boat Strike May Have Killed Victims of Human Trafficking
June 11, 2026
Take Action Now If this boat was running drugs, why was it loaded with so many people?By Nick Turse, The Intercept Nine months into the Trump…
The New Documentary “An Ordinary Insanity”
June 11, 2026
Take Action Now Only when such sanity becomes ordinary will we have a chance of surviving the nuclear era.By Robert Ellsberg This film presents a…




