The Dahiya doctrine, expanded in Israel’s siege of Gaza, sees non-combatants as acceptable targets.
by Arvind Dilawar, The Progressive
Firing on Palestinians waving white flags, shelling a house in which they were forced to gather, refusing to allow the wounded to evacuate or ambulances to respond—while none of these acts by the Israeli military would be out of place in its current assault on Gaza, this list comes from a 2009 report by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Known as the “Goldstone Report,” after South African judge Richard Goldstone, it covers Israel’s war on Gaza from 2008 to 2009, in which 1,444 Palestinians and thirteen Israelis were killed.
In an attempt to justify the Israeli military’s violence against civilians, Israel claimed they had issued pre-raid warnings via calls, leaflets, and radio broadcasts, as well as conceding some “operational errors.” But the Goldstone Report also cites the apparent application of the “Dahiya Doctrine,” Israel’s intentional and explicit targeting of civilians as a fundamental part of its military strategy.
![Wounded Palestinians were transferred to Al-Najjar Hospital after being targeted by Israeli warplanes, in the city of Rafah, south of the Gaza Strip, on October 13 2023](https://progressivehub.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Wounded-Palestinians-were-transferred-to-Al-Najjar-Hospital-after-being-targeted-by-Israeli-warplanes-in-the-city-of-Rafah-south-of-the-Gaza-Strip-on-October-13-2023-uai-258x145.png)
The Dahiya Doctrine is named after the Dahieh (also transliterated as Dahiya) suburb of Beirut, a political stronghold of Hezbollah, the Shia political party and militia in Lebanon. During Israel’s war with Lebanon in 2006, known civilian targets in Dahieh were deliberately and widely attacked by the Israeli military, virtually wiping out the entire neighborhood. And Israeli general Gadi Eisenkot told an Israeli newspaper two years later:
What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on . . . . We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases . . . . This is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved.
The “plan,” as Eisenkot put it, was to respond to any attack with intentionally disproportionate violence—not to necessarily defeat the attackers, but to punish the entire population through the deliberate killing of civilians and destruction of civil infrastructure.
Recent Posts
VIDEO: A Blueprint For Countering American Fascism
July 26, 2024
Take Action Now Our First Annual Henry A. Wallace Symposium offered lessons from real-life heartland organizers on how to fight for a multiracial…
Gavin Newsom Orders Removal Of Homeless Encampments
July 26, 2024
Take Action Now “The only way to end homeless encampments in California is to end the need for homeless encampments,” an expert said.…
The Crackdown On Antisemitism Doesn’t Have Much To Do With Antisemitism
July 26, 2024
Take Action Now Republican lawmakers increasingly conflate anti-Zionism with antisemitism in an effort limit pro-Palestine speech and criticism of…
Netanyahu’s Unhinged And Bellicose Congressional Address Draws Scorn
July 25, 2024
Take Action Now ‘Our enemies are your enemies,’ the prime minister insisted, setting up confrontation with Iran. By Blaise Malley,…