Most of the places that should be protected do not belong to federal lands. More than half of the country’s forests are privately owned
By Jordan G. Teicher, TheBaffler
When the billionaire John Malone became the country’s largest private landowner in 2011 with the purchase of nearly a million acres of forest in Maine and New Hampshire, it sparked a great deal of curiosity in the press. Why, reporters wanted to know, did a then-seventy-year-old media tycoon want to own 2.2 million acres of land—an area roughly half the size of Lake Ontario?
Malone has offered a variety of mundane reasons over the years, including his Irish heritage, his wife’s horseback riding hobby, and the joy he takes in being “out in the open.” The most creative among them, though, came during a CNBC interview, when he described his decades-long land binge as a kind of affliction, a “virus” passed on to him by his friend, CNN founder Ted Turner—a fellow billionaire who, after Malone’s 2011 purchase, became merely the second-largest land baron in the country.
If a lust for land among the billionaire class is a virus, it has become something of an epidemic recently. In 2007, the nation’s hundred largest private landowning families owned a combined 27 million acres of land—an area, as the Washington Post reported, the size of Maine and New Hampshire combined. By 2017, they’d increased their haul by nearly 50 percent to encompass an area equivalent to all of New England minus Vermont. In the pages of The Land Report—a magazine that covers land ownership—wealthy readers can browse new potential additions to their territory: a mountain range for $60 million, a collection of watersheds and creeks for $68 million, a “combination of landscapes” for $96 million.

If a lust for land among the billionaire class is a virus, it has become something of an epidemic recently. In 2007, the nation’s hundred largest private landowning families owned a combined 27 million acres of land—an area, as the Washington Post reported, the size of Maine and New Hampshire combined. By 2017, they’d increased their haul by nearly 50 percent to encompass an area equivalent to all of New England minus Vermont. In the pages of The Land Report—a magazine that covers land ownership—wealthy readers can browse new potential additions to their territory: a mountain range for $60 million, a collection of watersheds and creeks for $68 million, a “combination of landscapes” for $96 million.
Recent Posts
Insurgent Candidate Victories Highlight Growing Movement Against Corporate & Elite Power: John Nichols
August 5, 2026
Take Action Now We continue to look at the results of those primary elections, with The Nation’s John Nichols calling it “a very good night for…
The Democratic party chair is a handy scapegoat. But the party’s problems are much bigger
August 5, 2026
Take Action Now Much of the criticism of Ken Martin is deserved. But his actions are symptomatic of a party that fails to listen to the grassroots…
From El Paso to ICE: When Anti-Immigrant Hate Becomes Government Policy
August 4, 2026
Take Action Now Is there a difference between trying to kill us and not caring if we live or die?By Unai Montes-Irueste, LA Progressive On August…
Thin-Skinned and Heavy Handed, The Trump Hypocrites like Marco “McCarthy” Rubio Are Wrong Again—on Cuba and Where “Terrorism” is Coming From
August 4, 2026
Take Action Now Those Who Challenge and Protest U.S. Policies Are Not Terrorists, and They Are Certainly NOT Paid By Other GovernmentsBy Former…




