For nine years, Democrats abandoned all else to focus on one thing: keeping Donald Trump out of office. In the process, they sidelined working-class concerns, lost crucial voters, and still failed — not once, but twice — to accomplish their singular goal.
By Ashely Bishop and Spencer Snyder, Jacobin
For the last three election cycles, the main project of the Democratic Party has been to keep Donald Trump out of office. Advancing policy to improve the lives of working people has been, at best, an afterthought and, at worst, a distraction. Every other aspect of politics has been deprioritized to favor this single goal, with “vote blue no matter who” emerging as the rallying cry.
But despite the elevation of beating Trump over important policy areas like health care, education, housing, worker protections, and so on, the strategy still failed — twice. Not only are working people now set to face the immense challenges of a second Trump term without any palpable progress that might have been achieved during the Joe Biden years, but the Democrats have also dramatically harmed their reputation and lost scores of working-class voters for nothing in the process.
In 2016, Bernie Sanders, running on a slate of policies designed to uplift the working class, faced unique opposition from within his own party and was presented as an unacceptable political risk. Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment, rather than learn from the surprising success of the Sanders campaign, blamed it for losing Clinton the general election.

Sanders faced the same interparty acrimony in 2020, with party elites coordinating the dropout of several popular primary opponents to boost Joe Biden’s chances. In the end, when Biden stepped over Bernie into the White House, the best the Democrats could say about him was, “Hey, at least he’s not Trump!”
In this most recent presidential election, Kamala Harris, especially toward the end of her campaign, succumbed to the fantasy that people were sufficiently afraid of Trump’s dictatorial potential and losing democracy that they would look past her party’s complete lack of major proposals to improve their material conditions. As even people close to the campaign have suggested, they were wrong.
Recent Posts
ICC Targets Smotrich For War Crimes— He Responds by Promising More War Crimes
May 20, 2026
Take Action Now Smotrich reportedly bragged about helping create more than 100 new settlements and 160 farming outposts, while the U.N. has reported…
Establishment Democrats Still Don’t Get Why They Lost in 2024
May 20, 2026
Take Action Now No amount of messaging acumen could have plastered over the gaping hole in Harris’ campaign: a total dearth of popular policies.By…
The CIA Goes to Cuba
May 19, 2026
Take Action Now After decades of covert operations, the CIA director has given the Cubans an overt ultimatum for change on the island.By Peter…
Minnesota Officials Charge ICE Agent Who Shot Venezuelan Immigrant & Falsely Reported What Happened
May 19, 2026
Take Action Now “That is what democracy looks like. It looks like separation of powers and getting material consequences [for] wrongdoing,” she……




