Even now, when scientists say we’ve done irreversible damage to our planet, corporate and legacy news outlets won’t give up the fossil fuel dollars.
By Alex Kotch and Maria Bustillos, Sludge
Who’s to blame for a lack of action on climate change? The oil companies, most obviously; PR and ad agencies, paid to hire chipper young adults urging viewers to become “energy voters”; Politicians who carry water for the fossil fuel industry. These are all easy to blame.

But without the complicity of corporate and legacy media, none of the fossil fuel industry’s propaganda would fly. Outlets including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post have been allies of the fossil fuel industry for decades, not only running their ads but helping to create them.
Even now, when scientists say we’ve done irreversible damage to our planet, these and other media giants won’t give up the fossil fuel dollars.
Creating ‘Issue Ads’ for Big Oil
When Mobil Oil and the Times teamed up to create the advertorial in the 1970s, their spin doctors admitted freely that the goal of the partnership was to “influence the influencers.” In fact, part of the original legal push for corporate personhood in the U.S. stems from those early Mobil campaigns.
Recent Posts
U.S. Media Keen on Iranian Unrest—Less So on U.S. and Israel’s Role in It
January 30, 2026
Take Action Now Democrats have a rare moment of leverage to pass legislation ending qualified immunity for Immigration and Customs Enforcement…
The Senate Must Not Fund ICE, A Zero Hour Conversation With Sonali Kolhatkar
January 30, 2026
Take Action Now “We’ve seen a really sharp change in how the public views immigration enforcement, particularly ice, to the point where…
How Democrats Can End Qualified Immunity for ICE Agents
January 28, 2026
Take Action Now Democrats have a rare moment of leverage to pass legislation ending qualified immunity for Immigration and Customs Enforcement…
Save New START- Nuclear Arms Treaties Must Not Expire
January 27, 2026
Take Action Now Letting New START expire would end more than a treaty — it would end the last remaining restraint on nuclear escalation.By Leah…



