As state supreme courts consolidate power and corporate money, shoddy oversight allows justices to hide their financial conflicts of interest from the public.
by Katya Schwenk, The Lever
In Arizona, a deep-pocketed anti-abortion group has been wining and dining a lawmaker who may be a deciding vote on a new effort to repeal the state’s draconian abortion ban — and the senator might have been accompanied by her husband, an Arizona Supreme Court justice who ruled earlier this month that the ban could take effect.
But the public doesn’t know for sure whether the justice attended the meals, because Arizona law doesn’t require justices to disclose gifts that don’t add up to more than $500 a year, even if these perks could have a direct bearing on cases they are deciding.

As the U.S. Supreme Court rolls back long-standing federal protections, leaving such matters to the states, judicial watchdog groups say they are increasingly concerned about ballooning special-interest money influencing state justices. Now a new report has found that thanks to weak financial disclosure laws, many state justices do not have to disclose gifts and perks that they or their spouses receive that could influence their increasingly momentous decisions on issues like abortion rights.
On the federal level, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s refusal to disclose lavish gifts, real estate deals, and travel perks from a billionaire benefactor with a vested interest in cases that came before the high court almost certainly violated federal disclosure laws.
Recent Posts
Supreme Court Ruling Allows ICE To Use Racial Profiling In Los Angeles Raids
September 10, 2025
Take Action Now Civil rights groups warn that Trump’s immigration crackdown has been given a green light to target Latinos across Southern…
Gaza Flotilla In Tunis Attacked By Explosives Delivered By A Drone
September 9, 2025
Take Action Now If Congress had to pass National War Authorization and Appropriations Acts instead of so-called National “Defense” Acts,…
Pentagon Official: Trump Boat Strike Was A Criminal Attack On Civilians
September 9, 2025
Take Action Now A current DoD official and many military legal experts say the U.S. attack on a boat in the Caribbean near Venezuela broke…
The Department Of War
September 8, 2025
Take Action Now If Congress had to pass National War Authorization and Appropriations Acts instead of so-called National “Defense” Acts,…