The 2024 election cycle has only just begun. But the prospects are not good that we will have a serious presidential candidate who dares to disagree with current war policy
by Paul Goldman, The Hill
Are America’s national interests best served by our stance on the Ukraine-Russia war? It is striking that within the Democratic Party, with its long tradition of anti-war activism, there are no prominent voices raising this question.
President Dwight Eisenhower warned against the influence of the military industrial complex on war policy. But he would likely fear speaking out today, even though the doomsday clock now says America’s stance on the Ukraine-Russian war has helped put all of us in the greatest peril ever. All the NATO countries disagree. As do the major newspaper editorial boards. Polls say about 90 percent of Democrats back continuing to give aid to Ukraine in its war against Russia.
As a consequence, no potential Democratic presidential contender dares to oppose the policy. Such public opposition would be labeled disloyal, even pro-Russian.
Yet history says the American people are being ill served by this chloroform of conformity. This is true based on an unimpeachable source: the American people.
Recent Posts
Why I’m Withdrawing My Fall Course At Columbia
Take Action Now The university’s draconian policies and new definition of antisemitism make much teaching impossible.By Rashid Khalidi, The…
After Eighty Years, Nuclear Threat Remains Grave
Take Action Now A nuclear war would be catastrophic. We must eliminate nuclear weapons to ensure events like the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and…
Trump Deploys Nuclear Subs Amid War Of Words With Russia’s Medvedev
Take Action Now The US president and the former Russian president have exchanged verbal threats about possible nuclear strikes amid the wars in Iran…
Should We Invade Israel in the Name of Humanitarianism?
Take Action Now For decades, liberal humanitarianism argued that the international community should take military action against states engaged in…