By Jonathan Cook, Antiwar.com
Should a human rights organization apologize for publishing important evidence of war crimes and human rights abuses?
If it does apologize, what does that suggest about its commitment to dispassionately uncovering the truth about the actions of both parties to war? And equally, what message does it send to those who claim to be “distressed” by the publication of such evidence?
Those are questions Amnesty International should have pondered far more carefully than it obviously did before issuing an apology last week over its latest report on the war in Ukraine.
In that report, Amnesty accused Ukrainian forces of committing war crimes by stationing troops and artillery in or near schools, hospitals and residential buildings, thereby using civilians effectively as human shields. Such practices by Ukrainian soldiers were identified in 19 different towns and villages.
These incidents did not just theoretically endanger civilians. There is evidence, according to Amnesty, that return fire by Russian troops on these Ukrainian positions led to non-combatants being killed.
Recent Posts
Israel’s War On The World
October 17, 2024
Take Action Now Over the years, the U.S. has partnered with Israel in its attacks on the UN, using its veto in the Security Council 40 times to…
The Curious Case of the Dog and the Abortion Pills
October 17, 2024
Take Action Now How the police and the Postal Service can combine forces to crack down on abortion by mailBy Debbie Nathan, Lux It was a tip that…
Is This Israel’s First Apartheid War?
October 17, 2024
Take Action Now Far from lacking a political strategy, Israel is fighting to reinforce the supremacist project it has built for decades between the…
How Can Democrats Win Back The White Working Class?
October 17, 2024
Take Action Now To become a party based among workers again, Democrats must remember that partisan commitment often grows from local roots.By…