By Jonathan Cook, Antiwar.com
Should a human rights organization apologize for publishing important evidence of war crimes and human rights abuses?
If it does apologize, what does that suggest about its commitment to dispassionately uncovering the truth about the actions of both parties to war? And equally, what message does it send to those who claim to be “distressed” by the publication of such evidence?
Those are questions Amnesty International should have pondered far more carefully than it obviously did before issuing an apology last week over its latest report on the war in Ukraine.
In that report, Amnesty accused Ukrainian forces of committing war crimes by stationing troops and artillery in or near schools, hospitals and residential buildings, thereby using civilians effectively as human shields. Such practices by Ukrainian soldiers were identified in 19 different towns and villages.
These incidents did not just theoretically endanger civilians. There is evidence, according to Amnesty, that return fire by Russian troops on these Ukrainian positions led to non-combatants being killed.
Recent Posts
Drone Warfare Has Exploded The Myth Of Reactor Safety
January 10, 2025
Take Action NowCheap drones can now penetrate the most sophisticated security perimeters — and nuclear reactors are a potential site of…
What Threats Face Pro-Palestine Activists As Trump Returns?
January 10, 2025
Take Action NowThe U.S. movement must be as resolute as the Palestinians themselves, who have demonstrated that, no matter what Israel does…
The Los Angeles Fires Are A Sign Of Things To Come
January 9, 2025
Take Action NowAround the world, dramatic swings between heavy rain and drought are increasing exponentially, according to new research.……
Tech Billionaires Are Lining Up To Kiss Trump’s Ring
January 9, 2025
Take Action NowBillionaires gonna billionaire — and lick the boots of whoever will bring them more riches and impunity.By Natasha…