Biden officials insist there have been no changes to its policy with respect to Beijing and Taiwan, but its words and actions say otherwise.
by Daniel Larison, Responsible Statecraft
The United States is reportedly planning to increase its military presence in Taiwan from nearly 40 to between 100 and 200 military personnel.
According to the first report by The Wall Street Journal last week, the additional troops will arrive in the coming months. The small number of U.S. forces in Taiwan has been growing steadily in recent years from less than two dozen at the start of 2021 to what could be nearly ten times as many by the middle of this year. News of the larger troop presence came on the heels of a high-level meeting between U.S. and Taiwanese officials in Washington last Tuesday. There are also separate reports that 500 Taiwanese troops will be sent to the United States for combat training.

While the total numbers involved are still small, these moves represent significant increases in cooperation between the two governments and could portend larger deployments in the future. As the Journal article states, the planned increase would be “the largest deployment of forces in decades by the U.S. on Taiwan.” The United States and Taiwan have had some military cooperation and unofficial ties despite the lack of formal relations between the two, but the difference now is that these ties are becoming stronger and more visible at the same time and therefore harder for the Chinese government to ignore.
The article suggested that the administration had been trying to keep the larger troop presence out of the public eye. According to the report, the training program is one that “the Pentagon has taken pains not to publicize,” but the public also has a right to know about decisions that the government is making that increase the direct U.S. commitment to Taiwan. If the Washington is going to deploy more troops to Taiwan than it has in decades, the public should be aware of it and Congress should be asking pointed questions about the potential implications of these decisions.
Recent Posts
Did A Federal Judge Sink Super PACs?
November 13, 2025
Take Action Now The judge blocked a ban on Super PACs in Maine — but legal activists discovered a kill switch inside the ruling.By David Sirota…
The Corporate Centrists Cannot Hold: ‘Big Tent’ Democrats Cave Once More
November 13, 2025
Take Action Now The perils of unprincipled, performative so-called “resistance.”By Christopher D. Cook, Common Dreams Wow, seriously? The…
One Weird Trick To Get Rid Of Chuck Schumer
November 12, 2025
Take Action Now Any single Senate Democrat can force a vote on Schumer’s job as minority leader.By Whitney Curry Wimbish, The American Prospect…
I Was One of the First People to Say “Don’t Run, Joe.” Now I’m Saying “Step Down, Chuck.”
November 11, 2025
Take Action Now Senate Democrats’ collapse in the latest government funding fight is just the latest example of the party’s inability to advance bold…




