Amid the internal battle over the New York Times’s coverage of Israel’s war, top editors handed down a set of directives.
by Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Grim, The Intercept
The New York Times instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept.
The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees.
The memo — written by Times standards editor Susan Wessling, international editor Philip Pan, and their deputies — “offers guidance about some terms and other issues we have grappled with since the start of the conflict in October.”
While the document is presented as an outline for maintaining objective journalistic principles in reporting on the Gaza war, several Times staffers told The Intercept that some of its contents show evidence of the paper’s deference to Israeli narratives.
Recent Posts
Critics Slam Meeks, Jeffries Pushing Off War Powers Bill Just as It Gets Enough Votes to Pass
Take Action Now “Each day we delay increases the risk of deeper US involvement and more lives lost,” said one progressive policy adviser. “Failing to…
The SAVE America Act Would Rig Our Elections
Take Action Now The bill would prevent millions of eligible Americans from voting — all to pave the way for authoritarianism and bigotry.By Jordan…
The Theft of Bodily Autonomy is Central to the Authoritarian Playbook, and Texas Has Been Its Proving Ground
Take Action Now Texas houses the country’s only family detention centers and has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the U.S., but it is…
Humanity Owes Cuba: Unilateral Coercive Measures and the Politics of Punishment
Take Action Now “There can be no clearer example of a violation of human rights than the economic embargo imposed by the United States against……