A Minnesota judge ruled that criminalizing Enbridge Line 3 water protectors would be a crime.
by Alleen Brown, Exposed by CMD
In a remarkable ruling last Thursday, a Minnesota judge summarily dismissed misdemeanor charges against three Anishinaabe water protectors who had protested at a pipeline construction site in an effort to stop the Enbridge Line 3 tar sands oil pipeline. “To criminalize their behavior would be the crime,” she concluded.
Judge Leslie Metzen relied on a rarely used Minnesota statute that allows a judge to dismiss a case if doing so furthers “justice.” She assessed that in this case justice meant throwing out charges against Anishinaabe people committed to preserving their treaty lands. “The court finds that it is within the furtherance of justice to protect the defendants peacefully protesting to protect the land and water,” she wrote.
“I’ve never seen a judge dismiss a case in the name of justice,” said Claire Glenn, a staff attorney at the Climate Defense Project, who was part of the defense team for the water protectors. She said that research undertaken by the legal team found very few cases where the statute had been cited previously.
Recent Posts
Black Votes Jeopardized by the SAVE Act
Take Action Now The SAVE Act would require proof of U.S. citizenship to be presented in person in order to register to vote in this country and would…
ICE and War Funding Can Now Become the Latest Excuse To Gut the Social Safety Net
Take Action Now Republicans don’t need to gut the social safety net again in order to pass Trump’s latest series of priorities. But…
Israel Is Stepping Up Its Ethnic Cleansing in the West Bank
Take Action Now Even as Israel attacks Iran and Lebanon, it is also intensifying ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. The military and settler militias…
Building Beyond ‘No Kings’
Take Action Now Why there is cause for both celebration and concern.By Christopher D. Cook, Common Dreams It’s easy to both celebrate and…