A Minnesota judge ruled that criminalizing Enbridge Line 3 water protectors would be a crime.
by Alleen Brown, Exposed by CMD
In a remarkable ruling last Thursday, a Minnesota judge summarily dismissed misdemeanor charges against three Anishinaabe water protectors who had protested at a pipeline construction site in an effort to stop the Enbridge Line 3 tar sands oil pipeline. “To criminalize their behavior would be the crime,” she concluded.
Judge Leslie Metzen relied on a rarely used Minnesota statute that allows a judge to dismiss a case if doing so furthers “justice.” She assessed that in this case justice meant throwing out charges against Anishinaabe people committed to preserving their treaty lands. “The court finds that it is within the furtherance of justice to protect the defendants peacefully protesting to protect the land and water,” she wrote.
“I’ve never seen a judge dismiss a case in the name of justice,” said Claire Glenn, a staff attorney at the Climate Defense Project, who was part of the defense team for the water protectors. She said that research undertaken by the legal team found very few cases where the statute had been cited previously.
Recent Posts
Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan Is A Racist Racket
January 14, 2025
Take Action NowTrump’s mass deportation plans are a racist racket with deep roots in U.S. history and law.By Alberto Toscano, In…
Los Angeles Firefighters Begged The City Not To Cut Funding
January 13, 2025
Take Action NowLess than a month ago, LA’s Fire Chief warned Mayor Karen Bass of “unprecedented operational challenges”.……
How The U.S. Media Hide Truths About The Gaza War
January 13, 2025
Take Action NowThe U.S. media is complicit is minimizing and hiding the truth about the carnage unfolding in Gaza.By Norman…
Drone Warfare Has Exploded The Myth Of Reactor Safety
January 10, 2025
Take Action NowCheap drones can now penetrate the most sophisticated security perimeters — and nuclear reactors are a potential site of…