If we want to understand the full picture of climate-fueled flood risk to New York City, we can’t just look at rainfall.
by Arielle Samuelson, Heated
If you read the news or scrolled social media this weekend, you probably heard that New York City experienced record-breaking rainfall and catastrophic flooding on Friday.
You probably heard that LaGuardia Airport shut down a terminal; that subway lines transformed into cesspools; that a whirlpool formed in Brooklyn; that a sea lion escaped its enclosure in the Central Park Zoo.
But what you may not have heard, as I hadn’t before yesterday, is that scientists who study coastal flooding actually consider Friday’s flood to be “mild.” That’s because, while the rainfall itself was record-breaking—more than 8.65 inches fell at JFK airport—the coastal flood level was only two feet above high tide.
That level of flooding is classified as an annual flood, said Kelly Van Baalen, project manager of Climate Central’s sea level rise team. “The numbers on the rainfall are a piece of it, but you would expect coastal flooding of this sort every year,” she said.
Recent Posts
The Senate Must Not Fund ICE
Take Action Now The money fueling ICE’s abuses comes directly out of the pockets of working Americans who are already struggling.By Sonali…
Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military
Take Action Now “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.”By Jon Queally, Common Dreams Despite…
CBP Agent Guns Down Minneapolis Nurse: Video Analysis
Take Action Now Meghnad Bose, Rana Roudi, and Ryan Grim break down video obtained by Drop Site showing CBP’s killing of Alex Jeffrey Pretti on…
The Supreme Court’s Quiet War On Cuba
Take Action Now Lawsuits by an oil giant and Cuban-American hardliners could help corporate interests recoup hundreds of millions in expropriated…