The company quietly told investors that its profits are threatened by its public crusade against the labor movement.
By David Sirota, The Lever
As Starbucks tries to crush a growing union drive among its workers, the company’s executives quietly admitted to investors that their anti-labor activities may destroy the coffee giant’s profits.
In the fine print of the company’s recent government filings, Starbucks first admits that “our wages and benefits programs may be insufficient,” but then slams unions, saying if labor organizing is successful “our labor costs could increase and our business could be negatively affected.”
Then the company made a stunning admission: “Our responses to any union organizing efforts could negatively impact how our brand is perceived and have adverse effects on our business, including on our financial results.”
Starbucks’ billionaire CEO Howard Schultz has been spearheading a public crusade to stop unionization…
Recent Posts
It’s Time to Topple the AI Oligarchy
Take Action Now The fight to halt data center construction is gaining steam—and it’s part of a broader effort to make artificial intelligence work…
Elect Democrats—But Should Hakeem Jeffries Be Speaker If He Rejects Medicare for All?
Take Action Now Elect Democrats to stop MAGA, but don’t surrender progressive accountability. Jeffries’ rejection of Medicare-for-All…
‘Zero Aid to Israel,’ Ro Khanna Declares at Democratic National Committee Meeting
Take Action Now “Israel has committed a genocide in Gaza, and we should have the courage to say so,” said the California Democrat.By Jake Johnson,…
“Moderates” Support Extreme Injustice
Take Action Now What’s so “moderate” about supporting genocide? Politicians are also routinely dubbed “moderate” when they’re running interference…