The company quietly told investors that its profits are threatened by its public crusade against the labor movement.
By David Sirota, The Lever
As Starbucks tries to crush a growing union drive among its workers, the company’s executives quietly admitted to investors that their anti-labor activities may destroy the coffee giant’s profits.
In the fine print of the company’s recent government filings, Starbucks first admits that “our wages and benefits programs may be insufficient,” but then slams unions, saying if labor organizing is successful “our labor costs could increase and our business could be negatively affected.”
Then the company made a stunning admission: “Our responses to any union organizing efforts could negatively impact how our brand is perceived and have adverse effects on our business, including on our financial results.”
Starbucks’ billionaire CEO Howard Schultz has been spearheading a public crusade to stop unionization…
Recent Posts
The Perilous Norm of Weapons Testing
Take Action Now It’s easy to dismiss a “test” as something less than the full terrifying reality of nuclear weapons use.By Emma Claire Foley On…
The Old Road Is Rapidly Aging
Take Action Now The Democratic Establishment Mistook Longevity for LeadershipBy Jackson Rubin, The Working Model If the Mamdani victory on Tuesday…
‘Absolutely Pathetic’: Senate Democrats Denounced For Caving To GOP In Shutdown Fight
Take Action Now “Let’s be clear — this proposal isn’t a compromise, it’s a capitulation,” said one progressive lawmaker in the US House.By Jon…
Layoffs in 2025 Second-Highest Since 2009 in Potential Sign of Looming Recession
Take Action Now “Those laid off now are finding it harder to quickly secure new roles,” one of the report’s authors said.By Chris Walker,…